| At present,the external environment for China’s economic development is complex and changeable,and the challenges and difficulties increase significantly.We must do a good job in the work on agriculture,rural areas and farmers and give full play to its role as a stabilizer in economic and social development.In January2021,the CPC Central Committee and the State Council issued the Opinions on Comprehensively Promoting Rural Revitalization and Accelerating Agricultural and Rural Modernization that the most arduous task to realizing the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation is still in rural areas,and the widest and deepest foundation is still in rural areas.We will solve the problem of unbalanced and inadequate development,and focus on agriculture,rural areas and farmers.In 2020,Xinyan Town of Jining City,Shandong Province,ranked 33 rd among The Top 100 Towns in China,and in 2021,it won the title of National Strong Agricultural Industry Town.In 2019,Xinyan Town was rated as a Municipal Rural Revitalization Demonstration Town.The rural economic and social development trend of Xinyan Town is good,and the rural industrial structure,economic and social structure,economic spatial structure change dramatically,which have certain typicality and representativeness in the rural development of China.Therefore,this paper,Wu Village and Niujialou Village of Xinyan Town are selected as the case places.In this paper,using literature analysis,field trips,questionnaire survey,spatial analysis,comparative analysis and content analysis,based on the rural space reproduction theory and Actor-Network Theory,discusses the spatial practice,spatial representation and spatial change and how actors through competition and cooperation,to reveal the rural regional system evolution law and mechanism,and provide reference for comprehensively promoting rural revitalization.The main conclusions are as follows:Through the study of the change process of spatial reproduction in the two case villages,it is found that the change process of spatial representation in the two villages is basically the same,and there are some differences in the change process of spatial practice and representation space.The production space and living space of Wu Village residents are separated,while Niujialou Village is an organic combination of production space and living space.The reshaping of the space of Wu Village and Niujialou Village system has brought about the concentration of government power in space.With the construction of the new rural community,the social relationship of the village is weakened,and the communication between the community residents is more cold.With the social space of the rural complex project of Niulou Town,the estrangement between the village and the village is gradually resolved,and the communication between the community residents is more frequent.Through the analysis of the actor network of Wu Village and Niujialou Village,it can be seen that the town government,enterprises and the village committee of the two villages play a key role in the actor network,in which the process of the town government and the village committee is roughly the same,but the enterprises of the two villages play a different role in the actor network.The heterogeneous action subjects of the two villages are based on their own interests,recruit and mobilize other actors in the actor network to solve the problems faced by rural development,until all actors in the actor network pass through the compulsory access points.The case of village spatial reproduction studied in this paper changes dramatically,which is a typical representative of the evolution of rural regional system in the new period in China.In Different villages,the rural change process and its mechanism are both different and common.It is worth noting that more and more natural villages in the rural space gradually disappear in the process of reproduction in many areas of China.The long-term impact of this change on Chinese rural revitalization needs to be further studied. |