Font Size: a A A

Biomechanical Analysis Of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Posted on:2024-03-12Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:J R LiFull Text:PDF
GTID:2544307148980119Subject:Surgery
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Objective:Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion(UBE-LIF)as a novel minimally invasive technique has been widely used in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases.By establishing a finite element model of UBE-LIF,the biomechanical characteristics of UBE-LIF technology were analysed and evaluated.The risk of cage subsidence was also evaluated.Methods:Based on the CT data of healthy adult male volunteers,the finite element models of L4-L5 vertebral body were constructed.According to the UBE-LIF operation method,the model with different cage heights of 8 mm,10 mm and 12 mm were successively constructed(normal bone and osteoporosis).The flexion,extension,right lateral bend,left lateral bend,right axial rotation,and left axial rotation motions were simulated in 6models with different bone conditions on the upper surface of L4 with 500 N followed load and 10 Nm torsional torque.The range of motion(ROM),Pedicle screw-rod system stress and endplate stress of each model under different working conditions were observed and analysed.Results:The ROM of the 12 mm model was the lowest,simultaneously,the maximum stress of the pedicle screw-rod system of the 12 mm model was the lowest.However,the 12 mm model has the largest endplate stress.The maximum stress of the L4 inferior endplate was greater than that of the L5 superior endplate in the UBE-LIF surgical models(24.1%).Compared with the normal model,the ROM of the osteoporosis model increased by5.4%,the maximum stress of the pedicle screw-rod system increased by 14%,and the maximum stress of the endplate increased by 7.5%.Conclusion:The results show that the appropriate height of the cage should be selected during the operation to ensure the stability of the segment and avoid the risk of the subsidence caused by the high cage.This is especially important for patients with osteoporosis.
Keywords/Search Tags:lumbar, Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic, lumbar interbody fusion, osteoporosis, finite element analysis
PDF Full Text Request
Related items
Retrospective Analysis Of Early Clinical Efficacy Of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion And Uniportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion For Single Level Ⅰ And Ⅱ Degree Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
Clinical Outcomes Of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ULIF) Compared With Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) In The Treatment Of Lumbar Instability
Comparison Of The Efficacy Of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion And Percutaneous Coaxial Large-Channel Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion In Treating Lumbar Degenerative Diseases
Efficacy Analysis Of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion For Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Comparison Of Short-term Efficacy Between Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion And Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion In The Treatment Of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Comparative Study On The Efficacy Of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Fusion And Percutaneous Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion In The Treatment Of Single-segment Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Technological Improvements In Biportal Endoscopic Spine Sugery And Clinical Studies Of Biportal Endoscopy-Assisted Lumbar Intervertebral Fusion
Observation On The Early Efficacy Of Unilateral Biportalendoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion In The Treatment Of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Preliminary Study Of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion For Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
10 Study On The Efficacy Of The Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy Technique Assisted Lumbar Interbody Fusion In The Treatment Of Degenerative Lumbar Diseases