Font Size: a A A

Analysis Of Related Factors Of Non-invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation Failure In Patients With Type Ⅱ Respiratory Failure

Posted on:2024-01-17Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:W WangFull Text:PDF
GTID:2544307112966109Subject:Clinical medicine
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Objective:In this study,by analyzing the basic information and test indexes of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation(NPPV)in the treatment of patients with acute onset of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(AECOPD)complicated with respiratory failure type II,the risk factors related to treatment failure of NPPV were explored,providing reference for clinical decision-making.Methods:A total of 107 patients with AECOPD combined with type II respiratory failure treated with NPPV admitted to The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College from June 2020 to September 2022 were collected.According to the outcome of the patients,they were divided into a successful treatment group of 84 cases and a failed treatment group of 23 cases.Clinical age,sex,body mass index(BMI),body temperature,heart rate,respiration,blood pressure,smoking history,hypertension history,diabetes history,Glasgow Coma Scale(GCS)score,acute physiology and chronic health(APACHE)Ⅱscore,white blood cell count,neutrophil percentage,hemoglobin,erythrocyte distribution width and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein(hs-CRP),Brain natriuretic peptide(BNP),fibrinogen,albumin,total cholesterol,triglyceride,creatinine,cystatin-C,creatinine/cystatin-C,mean low-density decay area percentage of both lungs(LAA%),PH before and after treatment,Arterial pressure of oxygen(Pa O2),Arterial pressure of carbon dioxide(Pa CO2),binary logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors associated with NPPV treatment failure of AECOPD complicated with respiratory failure type II.Results:1.Comparison of basic clinical data between the successful and unsuccessful NPPV treatment groups:The APACHEⅡscore of the failed NPPV treatment group was higher than that of the successful group(18.52±1.410 vs 13.01±2.051,points).The difference was statistically significant(P<0.001),but there were no statistically significant differences in age,gender,BMI,body temperature,heart rate,respiration,blood pressure,smoking history,hypertension history,diabetes history and GCS score between the two groups at admission(P>0.05).2.Comparison of blood routine,biochemical and imaging data on admission between the two groups:On admission,the procalcitonin in the failed group was higher than that in the successful group(0.052 vs0.40,ng/m L),and the D-dimer in the failed group was also higher than that in the successful group(1.03 vs 0.59,ug/m L),the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There were no significant differences in white blood cell count,percentage of neutrophils,hemoglobin,distribution width of red blood cells,hs-CRP,BNP,fibrinogen,albumin,total cholesterol,triglyceride,creatinine,cystatin C,creatinine/cystatin C,and average LAA%between the two groups at admission(P>0.05).3.Comparison of arterial blood gas between the two groups before and after treatment:There was no statistical difference in Pa O2 and Pa CO2 between the two groups at admission,the PH value of the failed group was lower than that of the successful group(7.23±0.08 vs7.30±0.05),the difference was statistically significant(P<0.001),and there was no statistical difference in Pa O2 between the two groups after 2 hours of NPPV treatment(P>0.05).The PH value of the failed group was lower than that of the successful group(7.25±0.07 vs 7.34±0.50),and the Pa CO2 was higher than that of the successful group(82.97±15.78 vs 63.32±13.58,mm Hg),the difference was statistically significant(P<0.001).4.Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the results with statistical differences showed that there was a statistical difference in APACHEⅡscore(P=0.007),but no statistical difference in procalcitonin,D-dimer,PH value at admission,PH value 2 hours after treatment and Pa CO2 2 hours after treatment(P>0.05).Conclusion:1.High APACHEⅡscore on admission is a possible risk factor for the failure of NPPV treatment in patients with AECOPD complicated with respiratory failure type II.2.Creatinine/cystatin-C in patients with AECOPD combined with respiratory failure typeⅡhad no predictive value for the therapeutic effect of NPPV.
Keywords/Search Tags:Acute onset of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Type Ⅱ respiratory failure, Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation, Risk factor
PDF Full Text Request
Related items
Effect Of Non-invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation On The AECOPD With Type Ⅱ Respiratory Failure With PH≥7.35
Clinical Efficacy And Safety Analysis Of Non-invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation In Elderly AECOPD Patients With Type Ⅱ Respiratory Failure
Analysis Of The Efficacy And Prognosis Of Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation In The Treatment Of AECOPD With Type Ⅱ Respiratory Failure
Home Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation In Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With Type â…¡ Respiratory Failure In Acute Exacerbation Effect Analysis
Effectiveness Of BiLevel Positive Airway Pressure Non-invasive Ventilation In AECOPD Complicated With Type â…¡ Respiratory Failure
A Prospective Study On The Duration Of Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation For One-day Treatment Of Acute Exacerbation Of COPD Complicated With Type Ⅱ Respiratory Failure
Correlation Between The Efficacy Of Non-invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation And Body Mass Index In Patients With AECOPD Combined With Type Ⅱ Respiratory Failure
Safety And Effectiveness Of Different Inspired Oxygen Concentration In Treatment Of AECOPD Patients With Type â…¡ Respiratory Failure Under The Condition Of Non-invasive Ventilation
Clinic Study Of Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation In Treatment Of Patients Due To Acute Exacerbation Of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With Type â…¡ Respiratory Failure
10 The Effect Of Mechanical Ventilation Timing On The Short-term Efficacy Of Patients With AECOPD And ARF