A Comparative Study Of Legal Measures In Solon And Zichan Reforms

More than 2500 years ago,ancient Greece and China during the Spring and Autumn Period were on the eve of a major historical change.At the turn of the 7th and 6th centuries BC,it was difficult to reconcile the internal class conflicts,and the crisis was serious.For the colonial movement that was still in the ascendant outside,Athens missed the opportunity to seize the opportunity,the country was turbulent,and the society was tired.During the middle and late period of the Spring and Autumn Period,as an important hub of the Central Plains-Zheng Guo’s rapid economic development,it could also face domestic political turbulence;internationally,the Jin-Chu struggle for hegemony was mixed.To this end,Solon and child products revised the law and carried out reforms.In the first chapter of this paper,first,by sorting out the national conditions of Athens and Zheng Guo at that time,studying the economic conditions of Athens and Zheng Guo,represented by agriculture,industry and commerce,and drawing different conclusions on the economic background of reforms by comparing the differences in economic conditions.Although the economic conditions are different,they have all caused fiscal distress,coupled with domestic turmoil,it is urgent to implement reforms that use legal production as the main means.The second chapter will study the specific content of the legal measures formulated in the Solon and child property reforms,because the legal reforms of both began in the economic field,deepened in the political system after achieving economic results,and after the successful implementation of the administrative legal system,In order to use civilians to restrain the old aristocracy and create or revise laws on social governance,the structure of this chapter will be divided into three major legal systems: economics,administrative management,and social governance.The third chapter is a comparative study chapter,which analyzes the similarities and differences in Solon’s and sub-property reforms.The similarities include legislative adjustments to agricultural production,reorganization of the original property rights,and the establishment of a legal system to restrict the old aristocracy.By comparison,it is concluded that the adjustment of tax law is an important link between economic legal reform and administrative legal reform.In the first section of the comparison of differences,the role of different tax laws in continuously deepening legal reform is discussed.In the reconstruction of the legal system,because the objective conditions are different,the two people have different politics and laws,so that people living on different lands have different paths.In the second and third subsections,the differences in legal systems of different paths are discussed.The legal system of ethics protects the rights of citizens,and the legalization of child property regulates government power.Finally,the historical impact of legal measures in the two-person reform is discussed.Because they are both maintaining the existing fundamental system to carry out institutional innovation.The fourth chapter studies the contradictions that both face in reforming the legal system as an independent section.By summarizing these contradictions and combining the above comparisons,we obtain the inspiration for the legal system and reform.