Research On The Effect Of Recreational Space And Service Facilities In Urban Mountain Parks In Guiyang City

In order to explore the function mechanism of recreation space and service facilities of urban mountain parks,this paper takes the urban mountain park in Guiyang as the research object,and uses the methods of questionnaire survey,field interview and space syntax to study the recreation space of Mountain Parks,so as to reveal the distribution characteristics of recreation space of Mountain Parks,and systematically and comprehensively evaluate the effect of citizens' recreation activities The rationality of the existing park space system and recreational service facilities.Combined with the satisfaction survey of supporting service facilities,this paper uses Pearson correlation analysis to test the correlation between recreation space efficiency and service facilities,and discusses the relationship between them.The findings are as follows:(1)Based on the field survey of 303 recreational spaces in six mountain Parks in Guiyang City,the number of recreational spaces is ranked as follows: 109 in Qianlingshan Park,63 in Huaxi Park,52 in Quanhu Park,29 in Denggaoyunshan Park,25 in Nanyashan Park and 25 in Nanjiao Park.From the aspects of space location,functional practicability and space use,the space combination modes are divided into five types,and the number and proportion of recreational space are ranked from high to low,that is,84(28%)are visually partially closed,69(23%)are visually completely closed,61(20%)are visually partially closed,45(15%)are visually completely open44(14%)were completely open in vision and substance.According to the types of activities and user relations,combined with the use of scenic spots,the space types are divided into 9 categories,including 9 categories of Qianlingshan Park,9 categories of Huaxi Park,7 categories of Nanjiao Park,7 categories of Denggaoyunshan Park,9categories of Quanhu Park and 6 categories of Nanyashan Park.According to the actual situation of the six mountain parks,there are obvious differences in the distribution of recreation space,and the overall layout of recreation space is linear.The results show that:(1)the order of spatial recreation matching degree from high to low is: square activity space > hard node space > under forest activity space >green space activity space > hard traffic space > hydrophilic recreation space >building recreation space > water space.(2)The order of spatial form aggregation degree from high to low is: Qianlingshan Park > Quanhu Park > Huaxi Park >Denggaoyunshan Park > Nanjiao Park > Nanyashan Park.(3)Qianlingshan Park and Huaxi Park show the distribution characteristics of double core irregular outward divergence,while Quanhu Park,Nanyashan Park,Nanjiao Park and Denggaoyunshan Park show the distribution characteristics of single core.The number of stay and pass through scenic spots of different groups are in the range of [1,4],and the order of scenic spot overlap from high to low is: Huaxi Park > Quanhu Park >Denggaoyunshan Park > Qianlingshan Park > Nanjiao Park > Nanyashan Park.(2)Through the weighted sum method,the recreation space efficiency of each park is obtained,and the results are ranked from high to low as follows: Qianlingshan Park,Huaxi Park,Quanhu Park,Denggaoyunshan Park,Nanjiao Park,Nanyashan Park,and the efficiency values are concentrated between [1,3].The order of per capita recreation efficiency index from high to low is: Qianlingshan Park,Denggaoyunshan Park,Quanhu Park,Huaxi Park,Nanjiao Park,Nanyashan Park,and the per capita efficiency value is between [0.2,1].According to the grade gradient,there are significant differences among the parks.In terms of each index,Huaxi Park,which is in the high grade,has a recreation space efficiency value of 2.395 and a per capita recreation service efficiency value of 0.438;in terms of each index,nanyashan Park,which is in the low grade,has a recreation space efficiency value of 1.166 and a per capita recreation service value of 0.212.The results show that the contribution values of recreation spatial efficiency index from large to small are as follows: spatial carrying intensity > recreation availability > spatial capacity.The contribution values of Qianlingshan Park,Denggaoyunshan Park and Nanjiao park are the same,while the contribution values of Huaxi Park and Nanyashan Park are the same.On the whole,there is a great difference in the service efficiency of per capita recreation space between parks.When the per capita accessibility is used as the evaluation index,the difference between parks is not obvious,and the service efficiency of recreation space has a centralized trend.(3)Guiyang Mountain Park service facilities are complete,involving nine types of facilities,including recreational facilities,safety facilities,health facilities,transportation facilities,information facilities,commercial facilities,science popularization and education facilities,management service facilities,fitness facilities.According to the evaluation of tourists' recreation experiences and facilities satisfaction,the damage rate of Qianlingshan Park,Huaxi Park,Quanhu Park and Denggaoyunshan Park is less,and all kinds of space supporting facilities provide convenient recreation support for tourists,which meets the tourists' experience demand to a certain extent;however,Nanyashan Park and Nanjiao Park have fewer types,fewer quantity and higher damage rate Therefore,tourists are greatly affected by the damage of facilities during the tour.The results show that the park space capacity,space carrying capacity,tourists' psychological recreation experiences,satisfaction of service facilities,visitors' accessibility to the park,the number of entrances and exits,the population density within the 500 m green space service range stipulated by the state,and tourists' overall experience in the park will directly affect the park service The use value of facilities in the park.The overall performance is as follows: large space capacity leads to greater demand for service facilities;large space carrying capacity leads to greater use intensity of service facilities;high recreation availability leads to higher satisfaction of service facilities.Therefore,the improvement of park recreation service efficiency needs tourists' sense of recreation experience to test,and the park recreation satisfaction needs tourists to have a good impression on the park's recreation activities and the use of various service facilities.