Research On Characteristics Of Tactics Application In World Men’s Gymnastics Team Competition

Gymnastics has a long history,but it developed slowly in the early days,and began to develop rapidly after the middle of the twentieth century,forming today’s competitive gymnastics.Competitive gymnastics is not only an advantageous event in my country,but also a key gold-winning event in the Olympic Games.The rapid development of men’s gymnastics in the world and the continuous improvement of the rules are a huge test for my country’s gymnastics.Our Chinese men’s gymnastics team has created a glorious history,especially in the 2008 Olympic Games,winning 7golds and 1 silver,but suffered a disastrous defeat in the 2016 Rio Olympics and only won a bronze medal.As a strong gymnastics country,there must be many reasons for such a cliff-like rout.Competitive gymnastics is a skill-oriented and difficult-to-bebeautiful event.At the same time,as an Olympic event,competitive gymnastics is developing continuously,and the level of competitive gymnastics in various countries is also steadily improving.The gap between gymnasts’ competitive levels is gradually narrowing,and the advantages of gymnasts with unique talents are no longer obvious.In most cases,athletes with similar strength compete.When we improve the competitive strength of competitive gymnasts,we must measure them in all directions.When the strength of competitive gymnasts is not much different,if we want to make new breakthroughs,we must conduct research from a new perspective.In the competition,we can determine the final competition result.In addition to the performance of the athletes’ own strength,it also includes the coaches’ understanding of the athletes’ technical and tactical strength reserves and the tactical control ability in the competition.This change is increasingly confirmed in various competitions.Using the method of case study,documentation,video observation,and logical analysis,this paper makes an analysis of the competition videos of the 48 th and 49 th World Gymnastics Championships and the 32 nd Olympic Gymnastics.The team composition,age,number of participating projects,difficulty selection,and action arrangement were counted,and the differences in tactical use in China,Japan,and Russia were analyzed,and suggestions for optimizing the use of tactics in my country were put forward.This paper draws the following conclusions:1 Difficulty tactics in gymnastics team competitions include the selection of complete sets of difficulty,tactics to increase difficulty,tactics to reduce difficulty,and substitution between different movements of the same difficulty.The Russian team and the British team are not dominant in the difficulty of the complete set,and they are in a passive position in the application of difficulty tactics;the Japanese team’s complete set of difficulty shows an upward trend year by year,and has achieved a go-ahead in the total difficulty score,getting rid of the disadvantage in the total difficulty score.;The Chinese team has always been in a leading position in the difficulty of complete sets,with a high difficulty reserve,and it is more flexible in the use of difficulty tactics,but with the great progress of the Japanese and Russian teams,my country’s huge advantage in difficulty points no longer exists.2 In terms of performance tactics,the Russian team has the highest completion score.By reducing the difficulty of complete sets of movements,the tactics of completing sets of movements with high quality and high stability also won the championship of the Tokyo Olympics;the Japanese team chose the difficulty and quality of movements to develop together.,did not reduce the difficulty while improving the quality;the Chinese team’s use of performance tactics was unsatisfactory,and the pursuit of difficulty resulted in slower progress in action quality and stability,and there was a certain gap between Japan and Russia.The British team has a low completion score but has grown rapidly,limited by the overall difficulty score is not high,and the total score is also behind the three teams of China,Japan and Russia.3 In the qualifying rounds,the Chinese team is accustomed to putting the strongest player in the last place.While the overall strength is on the rise,a relatively weak player is arranged in the third place,namely "Xianyang".The Japanese team also showed an upward trend in overall strength.A weaker player was placed in the second position,followed by the strongest player in the team,forming a contrast,and finally a strong player Moderate players,that is,"press down first,then up and down";the strongest player of the Russian team played in the second place,the British team placed the strongest player in the third place,and then the strength of the players decreased.There is a trend of "first up and then down".In the final,the stronger player of the Chinese team played in the middle,and the Japanese and Russian teams tended to put the stronger player at the end.4 In the application of choreography and tactics,the proportion of skill movements and non-skill movements of the three teams in the floor exercise project is relatively balanced,and the Japanese team conforms to the rules in the non-skill movements,and uses high acute angle support for many times,which is relatively novel.The arrangement of the pommel horse project is relatively conventional for the Chinese and British teams.Both the Russian and Japanese teams have added "Businari" to the action set to make the action more "three-dimensional",and the Japanese player Kitaenjo Ryu almost all uses "Thomas" in the action set.Class actions to reduce the deduction factor and have a unique understanding of the rules.In the lifting ring event,the number of the first type of movements used by each team is similar.The Chinese and Japanese teams choose more from the swing to the power static movement,and the Russian and British teams use the power static movement more.The Chinese and British teams chose the same kind of action in the vault event,and there was a phenomenon of homogeneity.The Japanese and Russian teams chose more diverse actions.In parallel bars,the Russian and British teams chose a large number of front-swing and swivel movements,while the Chinese and Japanese teams chose "Ciri" with higher difficulty value and stable movements.In the arrangement of the horizontal bar event,in addition to the British team,the Chinese,Japanese,and Russian teams all have the flight + flight connection for extra points.Make me more precise.5 The Japanese team and the British team took each team member to participate in all events in the qualifying round.The individual athletes of the two teams from China and Russia only participated in the necessary events in the qualifying matches,and the athletes’ physical fitness was well distributed.