| Modern football matches are faster,more powerful,more intense in confrontation,and more proficient in overall attack and defense coordination under the all-out attack and all-out defense method.The gap between Chinese football and European football powers has been gradually widened.The future development of Chinese football should first start from the domestic top league,face up to the technical and tactical deficiencies and gaps with the world’s top league teams,so as to solve the deficiencies and narrow the gap in time.This paper makes clear the specific gap between the Chinese local excellent football club and the European excellent football club competition,and puts forward targeted suggestions to help and improve the development of men’s football in China.I first determined the playing style of the target team and screened out the key technical and tactical indicators through expert interviews,questionnaires and literature,Then,through video observation,mathematical statistics and comparative analysis,this paper analyzes the personal offensive techniques（short pass,long pass,forward pass,shot,hit,pass in the restricted area,front court breakthrough）,personal offensive tactics（1v1 shooting,1v1 breakthrough,1v1 dribbling away,1v1 receiving and controlling the ball）of the top four teams in the 2019 China Football Super League and the top four teams in the 2019-2020 European football champions league Group attack tactics（penetration ball,wall cooperation,passing and cutting cooperation,back set cooperation,handover cooperation,2v2 creation 1v1cooperation）,overall attack tactics（backcourt organization attack under pressure,midfield ball control promotion under pressure,front court cooperation attack）,from defense to attack（counterattack,fast break,shooting immediately after the ball is obtained）,defense techniques（interception,blocking the cross,striving for the top,breaking through,and grabbing the ball）Statistics,collation and analysis of the data of group defense tactics（two person attack,three person oppression,four person prism oppression）,overall defense tactics（deep and intensive defense in the backcourt,midfield array defense,high-level compression after the front field array）,from attack to defense（immediate compression in the front field,immediate compression in the middle field,immediate compression in the back field,backstep array defense in the front field,backstep array defense in the middle field,backstep array defense in the middle field）,set pieces attack and set pieces defense,So as to carry out comparative research and analysis between techniques and tactics.The results show that:1、Offensive technology: there are significant differences between the top four teams of CSL and the top four teams of UEFA Champions League in the following aspects: total number of passes,backcourt passes,midfield passes,forward passes,forward passes,front court passes,front court passes,front court passes,long passes,short passes and close shots.There was no significant difference in front field passes,total number of long passes,middle field long passes,forward midfield passes,crosses,inside the penalty area passes,long shots,total number of shots,total number of shots on target,absolute scoring chances,scoring,head shots,foot shots and front field penetration.2、Attack tactics: In terms of individual attack tactics,the top four teams of CSL have a significant gap with the top four teams of UEFA Champions League in 1V1 penetration,1V1 dribbling away,1V1 receiving and controlling the ball,and there is no significant gap in individual shooting.Group attack tactics: there are significant differences between the top four teams of CSL and the top four teams of UEFA Champions League in the aspects of wall coordination,penetration ball coordination,midfield ball transition coordination,and cross coordination.There are no significant differences between the top four teams of CSL and the top four teams of UEFA Champions League in the aspects of forward ball transition coordination,back-set coordination,and 2V2 creating 1V1 coordination.In terms of overall attack tactics after deployment,the top four teams of Chinese Super League have significant differences with the top four teams of European Champions League in terms of organizing attack in the back field under pressure,and there is no significant difference between the two sides in terms of advancing the ball in the midfield and coordinating attack in the front field under pressure.From defense to offense: There is a significant difference between the top four teams of the Chinese Super League and the top four teams of the European Champions League in terms of scoring on successful counter-attacks,Both sides averages retaliate,success,success in the back,on average,short pass,average successful counterattack in the long ball,retaliate shot,success in the average time needed for participation and successful counterattack average,averaging a fast-break number,averaging fast break success,rushing average time needed for participation and success rushing average,fast-break points,rushing average short passing,into success There was no significant difference in average long pass,fast break shooting and instant shooting.3、Defensive technology: there is no significant difference between the two sides in interception technology,head-to-head technology and ball grabbing technology.4、Defensive tactics: Group defensive tactics: there are significant differences between the top four teams of THE Chinese Super League and the top four teams of the European Champions league in terms of the average number of three-man press and three-man back side press,and there are no significant differences between the two sides in two-man flanking and four-man edge press.Overall defense: there is no significant difference between the two sides in pressing defense from high position in front court,positioning defense in midfield and dense defense in back court.Defense-to-attack tactics: there is no significant difference in front court,midfield and back court pressing immediately.The top four teams of Chinese Super League are significantly different from the top four teams of European Champions League in gaining possession of the ball within 5 seconds from the front court pressing immediately.The top four teams in the Chinese Super League are significantly different from the top four teams in the European Champions League.5、Set pieces: Free kick attack tactics: there is no significant difference between the two sides in the direct shooting of the free kick and the tactical coordination of the free kick.Defensive tactics of free kick: there is no significant difference between the two sides in defending the direct shooting of the free kick and the tactical cooperation of the free kick.Corner kick attack: there is no significant difference between the two sides in passing corner kicks to the front,middle,back and tactical corner kicks.Corner kick defense: there is no significant difference between the two sides in defending the opposition corner kick to the front,middle and back points and in defending the tactical corner kick.Analysis conclusion:1、Offensive skills: Under the defensive pressure of the other side,the top four teams of the Chinese Super League did not observe the ball holder enough,and the players without the ball did not move enough to pass the ball,resulting in less pass times and low efficiency,so they could not pass through the midfield area through simple and effective passes;The pass in the front court area can not effectively penetrate into the opponent’s restricted area,with many long-range shots and poor shooting ability.2、 Offensive tactics: there is a big gap between the top four teams of the CSL and the top four teams of the Champions League in terms of personal tactical ability（1v1 breakthrough,1v1 dribbling and getting rid of,1v1 receiving and controlling the ball）and wall cooperation,penetration and handover of the ball.When organizing the attack in the backcourt and advancing the ball control in the midfield,they cannot break the opposite defense line in time;In the front court,the players of the top four teams of the CSL are lack of personal breakthrough ability,and the method of group attack is single.They rely too much on the attack cooperation mode of direct pass oblique pass,oblique pass direct pass,oblique pass oblique pass or 1v1 through 2v2 to create conditions for foreign aid to face local defenders alone,and the success rate of the above cooperation is low.The top four teams in the Champions League have a more comprehensive team cooperation attack,and each cooperation maintains a high success rate.The top four teams in the Champions League are more effective in counterattack and fast break（less time,fewer passes,and higher success rate of shooting）3、Defensive skills: the members of the top four teams of the CSL are not able to judge the landing point of the ball,make use of the body position and fight in the air.It is difficult to give full play to all their skills when competing for the top ball with body contact.The success rate of the top four teams of the CSL in the midfield is low,but the ball grabbing skills in the midfield and backcourt are better than those of the top four teams of the Champions League.4、 Defensive tactics: the top four teams in the Champions League prefer to use the two person attack tactics in the area far away from the goal to regain the ball right,and the players’ pressing speed is fast,the space is blocked more timely and the efficiency is high;The top four of the CSL are more accustomed to the use of three person oppression.They invest a lot of people but can not form a good blockade area in time,resulting in low efficiency;The top four teams in the Champions League adopt more overall defense from the front court to the back court.In the overall defense,the position distance of personnel is appropriate,the distance between defense lines is better,the fluctuation and swing of defense lines are more reasonable and integrated,and the success rate is higher.When the ball power is changed,the top four teams of the Champions League will oppress the side road in the opposite direction at the first time,regain the ball power as far away from the goal of their own side as possible,and try to regain the ball power within 5S after the other side obtains the ball power or within 5 passes of the opponent.When the top four teams of the CSL adopt the immediate oppression tactics,the players’ actions are not unified and can not form a siege to the threatening players,and ultimately can not effectively regain the ball power.Similarly,the defensive formation of the top four teams of the CSL is loose when the middle and front court oppresses the defense,the distance between players is unreasonable,and the players have a poor sense of complementary position and ability.5、Set pieces tactics: there are problems in the choice of shooting footwork and shooting line when the top four teams of the Chinese Super League shoot a direct free kick in the front court;The tactical free kick coordination is not sharp enough,and it cannot threaten the goal through simple and effective coordination.The change of corner kick is single,the cooperation between the free throw players and the running players without the ball is not tacit,and they rely too much on the attack of sending the corner kick to the back point area,and the attack of sending the corner kick to the front point and the middle point area is less;The number of tactical corner kicks is small,and there is no effective attack routine.In the aspect of defensive tactics free kick,it is easy to miss the offensive players and lose the defensive position;The efficiency of defending long passing corner to the front point and the middle point is high,and it is easy to miss defense when defending the back point corner;The awareness of corner kick in defensive tactics is weak,and there is no targeted defensive tactics. |
