| The dissertation is the comprehensive embodiment of the graduate students’ scientific research by using the theoretical knowledge and scientific research methods.The quality of dissertation is not only an important performance of postgraduate’s scientific research ability,but also a direct reflection of postgraduate’s training quality." Bad review" by analyzing the typical characteristics of master degree theses of master of professional degree,professional degree master clear degree for reading may exist problems and errors in writing the paper,as a tutor for professional master’s degree for targeted research training and academic paper writing guide provides valuable reference data,to improve the quality of master degree theses of master of professional degree and developing level of ascension has the vital significance.This study makes a statistical analysis of the familiarity of experts to papers,the consistency of the evaluation of papers and the distribution of the words of experts in the 1,486 "poor evaluation" professional master degree review opinions on illiteracy in H province in 2019,and verifies that blind review review materials have certain representativeness and high credibility.The word frequency statistics and coding analysis are made for blind review comments,and the non-quantitative blind review comments are converted into quantitative data.Through the analysis of relevant data,thispaper reveals the problems,typical characteristics and performance of the professional master’s thesis of "negative evaluation".Based on the statistical analysis of the word frequency of more than 530,000 words,30 high-frequency words were integrated and extracted as the reference of coding nodes.The top five words in terms of frequency were analysis,suggestions,problems,norms and methods.Combined with the four basic elements of paper review and 30 high frequency words,blind review comments are further coded.Come to the conclusion that "bad review" professional master’s degree thesis present twelve typical characteristics,namely,improper choice,on the basis of fuzzy,title confusion,unknown,reviews the rough,restatement light review,lack of innovation,innovative general,weak theory,application value is low,the analysis of shallow vague,content simple trick question,the method of fuzzy not science,inadequate data,the concept is not clear,The theory is disjoined,the structure is unreasonable,the problems are broad and unclear,the conclusions are vague and wrong,the countermeasures and suggestions are vague,the words are obscure,the format is abnormal,and the scientific research attitude is not rigorous.Based on the analysis of the typical characteristics of "poor evaluation" professional master’s thesis,this paper proposes countermeasures and suggestions to optimize the quality of the thesis,such as consolidating the professional foundation,improving method awareness,strengthening academic norms,correcting the attitude of scientific research,broadening the research field,cultivating innovative application thinking,adhering to the process orientation,and strengthening process supervision. |