| With the fast development of modern football,faster transition and higher technique& tactic level raise a higher demand to each player’s offence & defense techniques.Technique,physicality and psychological quality are closely related to tactical quality,which constitute the four major factors influencing the development of football.Of all,football technique occupies a special position in football games because it is the prerequisite and guarantee in completing tactical combination and achieving tactical effects.Especially in youth football,technique level decides to some extent the quality of young players’ cultivation.By adopting methods of documentation,field survey,video observation,comparative analysis,this research analyzed the offence & defense techniques of Qinhuangdao BSU FC U17 in 2019 season games and put forward relevant conclusions and suggestions based on the author’s research findings with the hope to provide some reference to future Qinhuangdao BSU FC U17 s or teams of other age groups as well as possibly relevant coaches for their trainings and games.Here are the research conclusions drawn from statistics and analysis.1.In NYSL,Qinhuangdao BSU FC U17 was better than opponents in all offence &defense techniques except for in the use of tackling technique,among which numbers of short pass and receiving,completion rate of short pass and receiving,numbers and completion rate of dribbling past opponents,shots,completion rate of recoveries during first half and whole game prevailed,and sometimes overwhelmingly,over opponents.2.During the first stage of CFA Cup,Qinhuangdao BSU FC U17 performed better than opponents in all offence & defense techniques except for some cases in the second half slightly worse in numbers of short pass and receiving,among which numbers of short pass and receiving in first half,numbers of long pass and receiving in whole game,numbers of dribbling past opponents during first half and whole game,completion rate of dribbling past opponents,shots and percentage of shots on target,recoveries in second half and whole game prevailed,sometimes overwhelmingly,over opponents.3.During the second stage of CFA Cup,Qinhuangdao BSU FC U17 under slightly underperformed opponents in completion rate of short pass and receiving;performed worse in both numbers and completion rate of tackling;was worse in numbers of recoveries during first half and whole game;was worse in heading respectively during first and second half,and whole game.This team’s completion rate of long pass and receiving,percentage of shots on targets and recoveries in second half were obviously,sometimes significantly,worse than opponents.4.It’s about application of goalkeeper’s offence & defense techniques.Qinhuangdao BSU FC U17’s goalkeepers obviously,sometimes significantly,outperformed opponents in proportion of short pass during NYSL games while this proportion dropped largely during second stage of CFA Cup.The completion rate of saving in first stage of CFA Cup was obviously,sometimes significantly,better than opponents while the statistics also dropped largely during second stage of CFA Cup.5.It’s about application of offence & defense techniques in different zones.The application of offence & defense techniques by Qinhuangdao BSU FC U17 was better than opponents in different zones except for the application of tackling both in numbers and completion rate which was worse.Among all,numbers of short pass and receiving in mid-and front field,numbers of long pass and receiving in midfield,completion rate of dribbling past opponent in mid-and front field,numbers of dribbling past opponent in front field,numbers and completion rate of shots in left front field,completion rate of recoveries in back and front fields,numbers of tackling and recovery in midfield prevailed,sometimes overwhelmingly,over opponents.During CFA Cup games,numbers and completion rate of dribbling past opponent by Qinhuangdao BSU FC U17 were better than opponents.On the other hand,completion rate of short pass and receiving in back field,completion rate of short pass and receiving in front field,completion rate of long pass and receiving in each zone,percentage of shots o target in mid-and front field,completion rate of tackling in midfield,completion rate of tackling in each zone,numbers of recovery in back field were all worse than opponents,especially completion rate of short pass and receiving in mid-and back field and numbers of recovery in back field,which were significantly worse than opponents. |