Study On The Connection Of The Verbal Evidence Of The Investigated Person

The supervisory commission,as an organ independently exercising the power of investigation,is independently responsible for the investigation of duty crimes,and transfers it if the facts of the crime are clear and the evidence is true and sufficient after the investigation to the People’s Procuratorate for examination in accordance with the law.This involves the connection between the supervisory organs and the procuratorial organs.Among them,under the background of the current supervision work with the goal of efficient anti-corruption,the supervisory organs intentionally or unintentionally rely on the verbal evidence for the investigation and evidence collection of duty crimes,especially the verbal evidence of the investigated people is more prominent.However,the formulation of the Supervision Law is somewhat hasty,including the exclusion of illegal evidence,the lack of the evidence rules of defective evidence,the defense system,the early involvement of the procuratorate,and the appearence of supervisors in court to testify.At the same time,the different focus of the two stages of work make the diffrence between Supervision Law and the Criminal Procedure Law,which still need to be run-in through practice.Therefore,it is imperative to properly deal with the transformation of speech evidence in duty crime cases in the two stages,and to step up the improvement of the legislative norms and institutional guarantee of speech evidence in the two stages.In view of this,in this paper,based on the learning of previous research,this paper will be roughly classified into five parts.The first part starts from the basic theory of the speech evidence of the respondent,and discusses the concept discrimination of the respondent’s speech evidence and the main views of the connection of the speech evidence.By sorting out the mainstream views of verbal evidence access,it lays a good foundation for the effective development of the evidence connection work.The second part expounds the necessity and feasibility of the evidence connection of duty crimes,and demonstrates the existence value of evidence connection from the particularity of the verbal evidence of the investigated person,the improvement of case litigation efficiency and the maintenance of substantive justice.The similarity of value pursuit and legal system setting determines the realistic possibility of evidence connection.In the third part,the current situation of the connection of duty crimes is discussed from the two aspects of the legislative defects and the problems in the supervision and inspection.The fourth part and the fifth part respectively from the perspective of evidence rules perfect and supporting system setting,response to the legislation,practice of existing respondent words evidence cohesion concerns,put forward clear words evidence material access qualification,perfect illegal words evidence exclusion rules,improve the human rights protection,optimize the supervision investigation external supervision,etc.