With the gradual development of the social market economy,private lending has also become one of the means for people to relieve funds.However,due to the lack of integrity of some citizens and the inadequacy of some legal systems,the phenomenon of false lawsuits is becoming more and more frequent.With a very strong momentum,it has spread rapidly in various regions,provinces and cities in our country,and has now had a huge negative impact on our country’s normal social and economic production and the order of residents’ lives.In such cases of false private lending litigation,the prosecutor and the accused have malicious collusion,fabricated creditor’s rights and debts,and jointly forged loan evidence,and filed a civil lawsuit in a court with jurisdiction.The true intention of the offender is It is hoped that through the use of wrong judgments made by the courts,the purpose of infringing on the interests of third parties,collectives or the state with its legitimate rights will extremely seriously endanger the judicial authority and judicial impartiality.Abusing the right of litigation to undermine social stability has caused a waste of judicial resources and harmed the rights and interests of right holders.Among them,the most serious problem of false litigation should indeed be private lending.The main purpose of filing such false litigation is to help the offender to fight against other effective discretionary debt performance in order to obtain more property or economic benefits.In judicial practice,false litigation cases of private borrowing have emerged one after another.The reasons for the frequent occurrence of such cases include: the lack of people’s concept of good faith,the limitation of the implementation of the third party withdrawing the lawsuit,and the court’s abuse of the mediation system.There is an illegal purpose in the integrity and morality of the parties.The current law is unable to examine the integrity of the parties in a comprehensive manner.They falsify and collude with the judges to obtain a favorable judgment for the borrowing relationship that does not exist.my country’s existing third-party revocation lawsuits conferred the right of self-relief to the third party outside the case.However,in the frequent false litigation cases of private lending in recent years,it is difficult for the third party to cancel the lawsuit to play a substantial role under normal circumstances.Therefore,it is necessary to further improve the identification mechanism and punishment mechanism of private lending false litigation.False litigation cases in private lending are a difficult point in the trial and handling of civil cases in my country for a long time.Therefore,further perfecting relevant laws has become an important part of promoting the construction of a stable society in my country.This article will give an in-depth explanation on the identification and response of false lawsuits on private lending. |