| The judge’s analytical thinking of the case is inconsistent with the public’s cognition of the case,which leads to the fact that the judicial judgment made by the judge is sometimes not recognized by the public.The conflict between judicial judgment and social cognition is not only the difference of value orientation and logical thinking at the ideological level,but also the non-independence of the judiciary and the imperfect communication mechanism between the public and the judiciary.With the rapid development of society and the popularization of the Internet,this contradiction is more and more prominent.Faced with this social problem,we must pay attention to and improve it.In view of this conflict,the following measures are put forward to improve the conflict:to clarify the value orientation of the judicial judgment and the judicial cognition of the public;In theory,based on the viewpoint of jurisprudence,we should pay more attention to substantive justice while pursuing formal justice.In practice,judges and lawyers should pay attention to the interpretation and explanation of legal expertise from the perspective of the public in the trial procedure,so that the public can better judge the judicial judgment and get recognition when they participate in the trial process as auditors.Both legal judgment documents and social media reports are directly to the public.Improving the reasoning of judgment documents and enhancing the professionalism and standardization of media reports are the most direct and effective ways to coordinate conflicts.Impartiality is the common pursuit of the judiciary and the public.It is necessary to improve the legal literacy of the public to better participate in judicial supervision,reduce external interference in the judiciary,and ensure the independence of the judiciary. |
