Legal Issues Of Electronic Data Evidence Identification Under Blockchain Technology

Blockchain technology,also known as "the next generation of disruptive innovation technology",has become a hot topic in the forefront of science and technology industry and even in all walks of life.There is no doubt that it will cause a new round of technological and industrial changes in the future.It can be said that people have established a decentralized,tamper proof,open and transparent information system by using blockchain technology,thus opening a new door to the world of trust.Electronic data,as a new type of evidence,is born with the Internet.They are born with the characteristics of virtuality,diversity,professionalism,and easy to be tampered with.This undoubtedly provides the basis for the judicial practice to determine the authenticity of electronic data sources,the legitimacy of electronic data forensics procedures,the integrity of electronic data forensics procedures,and the integrity of electronic data forensics procedures The relevance of electronic data and the effectiveness of electronic data authentication bring great challenges.The rapid development of blockchain technology has brought a turning point to the challenges faced by electronic data in the aspects of collection,storage and identification.Blockchain technology with the characteristics of decentralization,effective anti tampering and real-time traceability has opened up a new path for the development of electronic data,and with the increasing level of blockchain technology,Gradually popularized to electronic data evidence in the judicial practice of evidence collection,storage,authentication of all aspects,to a certain extent,enhance the judicial credibility.However,at the same time,we need to keep a sober attitude towards blockchain technology.Although blockchain technology has been applied to a certain scale in judicial practice,the current technology development has encountered bottlenecks,and the existing consensus mechanism is not yet mature,which can not guarantee the authenticity and comprehensiveness of evidence sources;Although the stored evidence can not be modified to a certain extent,there is a lack of standard judicial interpretation and applicable rules in the forensics process.In addition,some third-party blockchain platforms with interests are trying to exploit legal loopholes,resulting in the lack of legitimacy in the forensics process;Although the technology can complete the evidence collection in the most timely and maximum quantity,it can not form a coherent evidence chain.The lack ofauthenticity,legitimacy and relevance of electronic data evidence under blockchain technology is the fundamental reason for the dilemma of the final identification link.Based on the past governance experience of the Internet,the way of "technology self certification" is very easy to produce "anarchism",and the future is endless,Before the emergence of electronic data evidence of blockchain,we should not only improve the law,but also improve the level of science and technology.In the process of storing evidence,we should not only unify the standards,but also judge the situation and change according to the time.After the identification of evidence,we should not only keep and keep the evidence,but also improve the supervision.We should combine technology with law,"using blockchain" and "judge review" to make the judicial work intelligent and humanized,Specialization is also popular.