Research On The System Of Criminal Judicial Expert Appearing In Court To Testify

The appraisal opinion is one of the types of criminal evidence,and has both scientific and legal characteristics.It plays an important role in proving criminal criminal activities and has important reference value for the judgment of facts in criminal cases.In particular,the revision of the Criminal Procedure Law in 2012 clarified the legal obligation of criminal judicial experts to testify in court.With the reform of the "trial-centric" litigation system and the revision of the Criminal Procedure Law in 2018,the normalization of criminal judicial experts to testify in court gradually advanced The principle of requiring evidence judgement requires criminal evidence to be cross-examined in court before it can be used as the basis for a case.Criminal judicial appraisers appear in court to explain their appraisal opinions,and accept the inquiries of both prosecutors and judges,as well as the performance of their statutory obligations.They also have a non-negligible effect on the judge ’s determination of the facts of the case.An important embodiment of transformation.However,due to the short history of development and the deep-rooted influence of traditional thoughts,there are some issues that cannot be ignored in judicial practice,such as the low rate of criminal judicial appraisers,the appearance of testimony in court,and criminal Forensic appraisers cannot guarantee a neutral stance and other issues.The existence of these problems is not conducive to the implementation of the system of witness testimony by criminal appraisers in China.In this regard,this article takes the criminal justice appraiser’s testimony system as the research object,and combines the perspective of the amendment of the Criminal Procedure Law and the "trial-centric" litigation system reform.Make a brief introduction,introduce the problems in the implementation of the system through practical data,and analyze the reasons behind the problems.Based on China’s national conditions,learn from the experience of the two major legal systems.From the legislative level,the judicial level,the cultural tradition and the social environment level,the corresponding suggestions are put forward,hoping to promote the implementation and development of the system of testimony of criminal justice appraisers in China,improve the efficiency of litigation,save judicial resources,and realize the substantive trial.