The Counter-evidence Of Abstract Dangerous Criminals And Realization Path

Abstract dangerous criminals have the defects of over-dilution and break through the principle of guilt,so it is necessary to reasonably limit the scope of punishment.While playing an active role in the modern risk control of abstract dangerous criminals,it is of positive theoretical value and practical necessity to effectively suppress the defects of character through the method of counter-incriminating sin.There are many viewpoints against abstract dangerous criminals,but each of the various opposing viewpoints has major flaws,which is not enough to be a legitimate basis for negating the counter-evidence of abstract dangerous criminals.The basic logic of presumption,the basic requirements of legal interest theory,the possibility of realistic counter-evidence,and the existing laws and regulations provide a powerful basis for the rationality argument of the abstract dangerous criminals.In addition,the real value of abstract dangerous criminal counter-evidence lies in its operability,which can be applied to judicial practice to improve the referee’s results.The realization of this purpose requires clear rules and standards that should be followed by counter-evidence,and design a reasonable and specific judicial realization path.