Controlling Multiple Minors To Engage In Profiteering Determination Of Service Behavior

With the rapid development of society,in the face of the numerous temptations and traps in the society,minors lack certain discrimination and self-protection capabilities,giving criminals an opportunity to organize the use of minors for profiteering behavior.This criminal act seriously infringed upon the legal rights and interests of minors,affected their physical and mental health,and caused very bad social harm.Therefore,it is necessary to analyze and organize the behavior of for-profit escort of minors,so as to balance the crime and punishment,better protect minors and maintain social order.In this article,the case of Zhao Moumou and his associates manipulating and using multiple minors to provide paid escort services in entertainment venues to obtain illegal income from them is adopted.The case analysis research method is used to legalize multiple crimes involved in the case.The analysis includes the discussion and analysis of the main content of organizing minors ’crimes of violating public security management activities,the key components of the crime of forced labor,and the comparative analysis of the relationship between the number of crimes of illegal detention and the above two counts.Based on the understanding of the relevant legal theory,further explore how to characterize the behavior of Zhao Moumou and others in this case.The main content of this article consists of the following four parts:The first part is the description of the basic situation of the disputed case.Through the introduction of the basic situation and the specific circumstances of the case of Zhao Moumou and others,the different views of the case in judicial practice are elaborated,and then the different opinions are sorted out and analyzed,and finally the three disputes of this case are summarized.The second part is the main part of this article,and introduces and analyzes the relevant jurisprudence related to the crime.From the controversial focus of the summary,on the one hand,it discusses and analyzes the disputes concerning the forced labor crime involved in the case,the crime of organizing minors to violate public security management activities,and the crime of illegal detention.On the other hand,the above crimes are A comparative analysis of the controversies in the determination of the number of crimes.The third part is the analysis and conclusion of the disputed case.Through jurisprudential analysis and understanding of the focus of the dispute,the conclusion of this case is drawn that: Zhao Mou et al.’S control of multiple minors to engage in for-profit escort does not constitute the crime of organizing minors to violate public security management activities and establish coercion.The criminals involved in labor crime and illegal detention are convicted and punished with the crime of forced labor in accordance with the principle of choosing one of the major crimes.The fourth part is the afterthought of the case.Through the analysis and discussion of this case,some enlightenment has been gained on the legal protection and criminal identification of minors.First,we must strengthen and improve the legal protection and legal education of minors.We must increase the punishment for the use of minors to commit crimes and crimes.The law protects the network to ensure the healthy growth of minors.Second,in judicial practice,we should pay attention to the important role of legal interest in criminal identification,and follow the legal principle of crime and punishment to convict and measure the use of minors to engage in related illegal and criminal acts.