On The Pragmatic Logic Of Legal Defense

An activity,especially one conducive to the identification of facts or the settlement of legal disputes.Although there are a variety of means to identify disputes and disputes,which can be open,defended by both parties,secret,private and unilateral statements,practice has found that openness and transparency and the form of debate between both parties are the most effective way to identify disputes and disputes.Legal defense,to be precise,should be called "court defense",but it is customary to regard "legal defense" and "court defense" as synonyms.When the judicial system is reformed along the direction of trial as the center,the importance of legal defense is becoming increasingly prominent,and the defense speech is the main carrier of legal defense.The law regulates various legal relations and various rights and obligations among States,groups and individuals in the form of chapters.In view of the practical characteristics of law,the analysis of opposing French texts should be combined with the nature of their social activities and highlight the communicative and pragmatic factors in the use of legal language.Different from previous studies focusing on syntax and vocabulary,more and more attention has been focused on discourse research in recent years,and the meaning of discourse semantics has been paid more and more attention.The rise of systemic functional linguistics provides new ideas for the study of defense.Martin,as a representative figure of Sydney school,has made great achievements in the development of systemic functional linguistics,and discourse semantic theory is Martin’s important research achievement.This paper demonstrates the importance of discourse pragmatic rules in the application of legal language,and discusses the pragmatic logic of defense words from the perspective of discourse semantic theory.The paper is divided into six parts.The first part is the introduction.This paper introduces the reason of the topic,explains the purpose,theoretical and practical significance of the topic,and lists the main research methods of the paper.The second part is the research situation of legal defense and defense at home and abroad,sorting out the research situation of legal defense and defense at home and abroad,and combing the context of academic research.The third part is pragmatic system analysis.Based on Halliday’s Systemic Functional Linguistics and Martin’s research content,the pragmatic system is divided into five points:evaluation system,conceptual system,connection system,recognition system and discourse metrical system.The fourth part is the choice of semantic resources in defense.Based on Halliday’s register theory,this paper explains the choice of semantic resources of defense words from three dimensions: field,tenor and mode.The fifth part is the pragmatic logical thinking in the defense,including the pragmatic points of assertion,the causal relationship of conclusion and the pragmatic behavior types of speech behavior.The sixth part is the conclusion.Summarize the full text.