The Research On The Cultural Personality Of Rebellious Son In Modern Chinese Family Novels

The image of rebellious son is a unique pedigree of Chinese modern family novels,and the cultural personality showing its behavior and ideological and spiritual core is an important basis for examining these images.This paper focuses on Gao Juehui in Family,Qi Ruiquan in Four Generations,and Jiang Chunzu in Children of the Rich Man,trying to show that their cultural personality is homogeneous with the development of social culture,and then reveals the fierceness and contradiction of young intellectuals in modern society.The research on the cultural personality of the inverse is mainly reflected in the following aspects.First of all,this paper argues that the generation of the cultural personality of the rebellious son is restricted by multiple internal and external factors.First,the "flower of evil" bred by the traditional autocratic and decadent culture of the family loses the legitimacy of ethics and morality in the cultural transformation period,and the conflict caused by tradition calls for the emergence of a personality who can boldly rebel;Second,the personality awakening of " people of a new type " in the era of enlightenment culture raises the individual consciousness and self-consciousness of the rebellious son,and forms a modern personality that is bold,rebellious and full of fighting passion and vitality;Third,the change under the orderly ethical order of the young and the old determines that the contemporary family youths generate personality characteristics with significant differences in personality,and the inverse grows in the atmosphere of coexistence of favor and neglect,while the marginalized state causes the inverse to drift away from the family center.The intersection of three aspects makes the cultural personality of the rebellious son different from him.Secondly,the cultural personality of the rebellious son is endowed with multiple metaphors through the writing of modern writers.First,the image of the rebellious son stands on the wilderness of Chinese culture in a rich and three-dimensional way with the combination of accumulated characters.Introverted seeking and redemption smears the background color and resistance tone of the rebellious son’s cultural personality by listening to the echo of lonely and wandering heart.The emotional impulse of the rebellious son is examined by the love psychology of the spiritual flesh,and the tension of the rebellious son’s personality and the contradiction of character are explored in the unity of opposites of "shrink and extend".Second,the practice of externalization of rebellious son shows the vanguard consciousness of defecting from besieged city,that is,the rebellion of family’s bold determination.In conflict and agreement,the prominence of rebellious trial thinking promotes the development of spiritual power,breaks through the siege of moral ethics and breaks the stable family order and stagnant development state.From besieged city to wilderness,the long spiritual wandering shows the spiritual prospect of entering the vast world from the narrow vision of family.Third,the choice of the times when the rebellious son seeks a different path embodies the writer’s conception of a new nation,showing the warm carnival and tragic feeling of imagining the future,and showing the flesh and blood temperature of the rebellious son’s maverick in a three-dimensional way.Finally,the richness and complexity of the cultural personality of the rebellious son have both constructive significance and reflection on the deficiency.The establishment of rebellious cultural personality forms an irresistible force in the trend of social history,destroys the original cultural structure,reconstructs a new value system,and realizes the transformation from closed to open,from traditional national culture to modern civilized spirit;In the efforts of reconstruction,the trend of cultural attachment reveals the attitude of "taking" radical culture and identifying with the essence of tradition;The lack of complexity caused by the writer’s aesthetic anxiety leads to the formation of historical philosophies without crossing the reality of modern ideology.