The Authenticity Of New Historicism Literature From The Perspective Of Aesthetic Discourse

New historicist literary criticism believes that the text cannot express the historical truth,and that historical facts are nothing more than people’s fantasies and fictions.The so-called "facts" woven by words actually imply a huge exchange of politics and interests.In this critical mode,literary texts have long lost their value of existence.The aesthetic discourse in literary texts is unimportant in the eyes of neohistorians,and is even regarded as an obstacle to approach objective facts.The author is beyond reproach to the development trend of "outward turning" in literary research in the post-modern context of the twentieth century.However,the authenticity of literature and the pursuit of authenticity of literature itself,as described by the New Historicists,are in fact no longer the same.After recognizing the problems in the authenticity of literature in the study of new historicism literary criticism,the author distinguishes the authenticity of literature from the authenticity of literature and the authenticity of literature.In addition,from the perspective of aesthetic discourse,the literary authenticity of New Historicism is explained how close to the authenticity of literature,so that New Historicism,as a literary criticism research method,can truly play a critical role in the study of literary texts.Actual guiding significance.This thesis is divided into six parts.The introduction part summarizes the development and research status of New Historicism.The main body is divided into four parts.The first part mainly discusses the possibility of the authenticity of new historicism in pursuit of the authenticity of literature;the second part discusses the aesthetic discourse as a way to make the authenticity of new historicism close to literature.The third part discusses the dilemma that New Historicism faces in the process of pursuing the authenticity of literature;the fourth part discusses that although aesthetic discourse can resolve the theoretical dilemma of New Historicism,the authenticity of literature itself restricts the elements Too much,and ultimately still cannot be achieved purely.Finally,the conclusion part summarizes the paper as a whole,and points out the innovations,shortcomings and areas for improvement of this paper.