A Study On The Problem Of "Thingness" In Literature

In the 1990 s,with the influence of "returning to things" and the ideological trend of cultural materialism,the study of material culture has increasingly become the focus of academic attention.The great abundance of material products and the increasing prosperity of cultural production in the era of market economy have led to the different functional characteristics of literary production methods,methods,technologies and media,forming the mutual coverage and flooding between "things" and "things" in today’s society.It is worth noting that when the mode of production,means of production,means of production and means of transmission and reception of literature have a certain materiality,the concept of literature as a product,commodity and consumer product arises spontaneously,and the problem of "material nature" in literature and thinking are ready to develop.Previous literature in literature theory as if always in thinking mode of binary opposition of spirit and matter and circle,on the shelf of the theoretical model of the literature from life,life is more ignored the relationship between literature and material life,thus ignoring the "physical" factors in the literature,as a result,literature "property" problem research must first rule out concept of binary opposition,straighten out the relationship between people and things,i.e.heart content or subject and object relations,based on the relationship between "content" of the cognitive and reconstruction,extension of deepening the research on literature "property" space Angle of view,vision,observes.Literature "property" problem research need to draw lessons from and absorb the marxist historical materialism and dialectical materialism,Raymond Williams’ cultural materialism,saussure’s structuralist linguistics,semiology,Roland barthes and phenomenology thought and theory resources,to provide literature "property" academic basis of the research and theoretical basis.The question of "material nature" of literature enables us to re-examine the deficiencies and deficiencies of previous literary theories,thus enriching and improving literary theories and expanding the space for deepening literary criticism.Literature "property" and "content" and "material" "materialized" concept of the "state" interpretation and refactoring enables us to return to Chinese traditional poetics and promote the development of creative transformation and innovation of the tradition,innovation and reconstruction "sense" exposition "materialized" "looking for" meaning,and again in the face of the present "the image turn" "spatial turn" and "visual culture to" based on the relationship between construction meaning of "property".Thus,"property" of literature research has focused on the physical nature of "literary object",from theperspective of literary creation process of revealing the "property" in object of literature factors,and then focus on "literary form" "physical" problem,respectively from the medium of language symbols,the content of his works,the literature analysis "properties",then use the literary criticism practice,through the analysis of ancient literature and contemporary literature review,from the Angle of "physical" criticism verify its rationality and validity.On this basis,this paper expounds the theoretical value and practical significance of the research on the problem of "material nature" in literature,"material nature poetics" and "material nature criticism".Above all,the thesis thinks: "property" through literature studies should reflect in source ontology,theory of literary theory and creation theory,theory,methodology,spread,accept and number of comments in the theoretical system and knowledge structure with missing,but limited to paper length and overall understanding of the cause of the difficulty,can only focus on a few point of view,to be deepening in the future.The problem of "material nature" of literature is a new Angle and direction for literature and literary theory research,which opens a new theoretical perspective and depth interpretation space for literary theory research in the new era.