A Study On The Writings Of The Han Writer About Inner Mongolia Since The New Period

Since the new period,the han writers have made abundant achievements in inner Mongolian writing.It is a phenomenon that deserves attention,and it is meaningful.Such writing behavior,as an expression practice,is a process in which many han writers constantly collide and interact with each other in the social and cultural field of Inner Mongolia.During the process,the han writers gradually discover new knowledge,and then construct a cultural form according to their understanding of the vision.To study it from a holistic perspective can deepen the understanding of cross-ethnic and cross-cultural creation,and can relatively analyze the transmutation characteristics of this kind of creation in the track of times.The text consists of two parts:the introduction and the main text.The preface expounds and summarizes the reasons and significance of the Han writers writing studies in Inner Mongolia since the new period,and summarizes the existing discussions.The main text has five chapters.The first chapter is an overview about the han writers’ s writings of inner Mongolian since 1949.It is based on the relatively homogeneous creation characteristics of han writers in inner Mongolian writing from1947 to 1976.Though it has developed more diversely,it can be sorted with three main types roughly since 1976.They are historical writing represented by Zhang Changgong ‘s "the desert south of the soul",and the new enlightenment era’s works represented by Feng Lingzhi’s prairie novels,and modern writings in the new century represented by Jiang Rong’s "Wolf Totem".These works have successed in the specific era.With extending different topics,they construct writing modes to response to the times.From the second chapter to the fourth chapter,each wrok has one chapter.In addition to paying attention to the different cultural identities of the writers,the article deliberately express opinions from the Mongolian and Han ethnic images,as well as the narrative perspective that includes the dual category of time and space.Even from the artistic presentation of Inner Mongolian resources to discuss.And at the same time,it tries to find the track through observes the scene of the times.It can be conclued as the follow,firstly it’s the empirical writing of modern ethnic history narrative in the early 1980s;Secondly,it’s thedual grassland structure carrying the main body’s consciousness tracing and the rational spirit germination in the trasition of the new enlightenment modernization;And the last is the unique national cultural forms that rexamine the interaction and conflict between the diverse cultures,and reflect the symbiosis of modernity inthe globalization trend of the new century.Based on this exploration of many literary perspectives,this paper collages the relative static value of works in different times.And in this method which relies on many literary perspectives,can multifacetedly creat a relatively static aspect of the works.The fifth chapter links up the common inner Mongolian intersections of the three main writing types,and tries to analyze and roughly summarize the dynamic diachronic evolution of inner Mongolian people,ethnic groups and the endoqualitative selection of natural human resources.This is specifically manifested as a change from "collective person" to "individual as the subject" to a person with "cross-cultural attributes";from the fraternal ethnic form attached to class discourse to pursuit minority subjectivity,and to concentrate to the specific ethnic ecology in the regional pattern of different sizes;from the dotted background presentation that relies on political narratives to the stylized artistic expression that carries romantic philosophies,to return the vivid nature itself.Besides,there are some problems in the writing of the Han writer Inner Mongolia,whicn need to reflect.In short,through the intervention of the Han perspective with different degrees,the Inner Mongolian writing of Han writers have completed the examination of the unique modernity experience of Inner Mongolia,and tentatively touched the complexity and ambiguity of the grassland since 1978.This narrative behavior unconsciously create some valuable problems.It is a uniquely meaningful attempt.Therefore,re-giving systematic historical reflection is a good measure to perfect the self-identification of the national traditional culture and the collective identity of the Chinese nation,and even the new and pluralistic Chinese literature and culture.It will have important implications,and it is exactly one of the countermeasures to meet the challenges of globalization.