Font Size: a A A

The Correlation Of Glycemic Variability And 1,5-anhydroglucitol With Acute-phase Insulin Secretion In Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Posted on:2021-06-19Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:Y M SiFull Text:PDF
GTID:2494306503489994Subject:Internal medicine (endocrinology and metabolic diseases)
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Objective:The study sought to examine the association of various indices ofβ-cell function with glycemic variability in Chinese insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes and the association of 1,5-AG with acute C peptide response(ACPR)to arginine among patients with type 2 diabetes.Methods:This clinical study first carried out in 507 hospitalized insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes.Glycemic variability was assessed from continuous glucose monitoring data recorded over 3 days by calculating the mean coefficient of variation(CV),and a cutoff value of CV≥36%was used to define unstable glucose.β-cell function was assessed by including basalβ-cell function and postloadβ-cell function.Basalβ-cell function obtained by fasting C-peptide(FCP)and the homeostasis model assessment 2 for b-cell function(HOMA2-%β).Postloadβ-cell function assessed by 2-hour C-peptide(2h CP)as well as the ACPR calculated by the means of the arginine stimulation tests(AST),in which ACPR was calculated as the mean C-peptide at 2,4,and 6 minutes minus the baseline C-peptide value.Secondly,we evaluated the relationship between 1,5-AG and the acute phase secretory function of isletβ-cell among 623 patients with type 2 diabetes.Impairedβ-cell function was defined as ACPR<2.1 ng/m L.Results:(1)Results found in 507 insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes,(1)ACPR,FCP and 2h CP decreased across quartiles of CV(for all trends,P<0.01);(2)The multivariable-adjusted odds ratio for labile glycemic control show that only ACPR was a significant and inverse predictor for labile glycemic control;(3)Multivariable-adjusted odds ratio for labile glycemic control of FCP,2h CP and HOMA2-%βdid not reach statistical differences considered neither as quartiles nor as continuous variables(all P>0.05).(2)(1)ACPR increased across quartiles of 1,5-AG(P for trend<0.001);(2)Multivariable adjusted odds ratios for impairedβ-cell function across quartiles of 1,5-AG were decreased(Ptrend=0.042);(3)Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that1,5-AG was one of the independent impacting factors of ACPR.Conclusions:ACPR evaluated by the arginine stimulation tests may be superior to FCP,2h CP and ACPR in reflecting glucose instability in insulin-treated patients with type 2diabetes.Furthermore,we found a graded negative association between 1,5-AG and the risk of acute phaseβ-cell function.
Keywords/Search Tags:Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Arginine stimulation test, Continuous glucose monitoring, Glycemic variability, Acute-phase insulin secretion, 1,5-anhydroglucitol
PDF Full Text Request
Related items