Research On The Role Positioning Of Government In The Mixed Ownership Reform Of State-owned Enterprises

In 1978,the Third Plenary Session of the Eleventh Central Committee of the Communist Party of China announced the implementation of the reform and opening up policy.The mixed ownership reform of state-owned enterprises and the development of mixed ownership economy were launched under such a historical background,and accompanied by the historical process of the reform of state-owned enterprises in China.In recent years,with the issuance of the Guiding Opinions on Deepening the Reform of State-owned Enterprises and 22 supporting documents,China has formed a "1+N" framework system for SOE reform,which provides guidance for the mixed ownership reform of state-owned enterprises.The issuance and implementation of the Three-Year Action Plan for SOE Reform（2020-2022）marks a new stage of comprehensively deepening the reform of mixed ownership in State-owned enterprises.The government plays an important role in the mixed ownership reform of state-owned enterprises,and it should not only perform its functions well,but also clarify its power boundary,so as to ensure the smooth progress of the reform.Therefore,it is of great significance to study the role positioning of the government in the mixed ownership reform of state-owned enterprises.The mixed ownership reform of state-owned enterprises in China has gone through many historical stages,and the role of the government has also evolved from "regulator" and "supervisor" to today’s "service provider".The role of the government as a "service provider" has been deeply rooted in the people’s hearts.At present,although the overall orientation of the government’s role as a "servant" is grasped accurately,there are some role deviations in the process of performing the corresponding functions,including the inadequacy of the functions of decision-makers,the dislocation of the functions of the owners of state-owned assets and regulators,and the offside of the functions of the guardians of supervision.It is embodied in the insufficient system supply,insufficient macro guidance,the separation of government and enterprise,the separation of government and capital,the intervention in the management of state-owned enterprises’ property rights,the intervention in the appointment of state-owned enterprises’ personnel,and the intervention in the operation and development of state-owned enterprises.This paper analyzes the reasons for the above problems in the following aspects: the thought of "official standard" leads to the serious administration of state-owned enterprises;The boundary between the "visible hand" and the "invisible hand" is blurred;The "top-level design" of the regulatory system and supervision mechanism is not perfect.Therefore,this article combed the mixed ownership reform of state-owned enterprises problems of government role,analyses the reasons of these problems,and draw lessons from GREE Electric appliances a new mixed ownership reform experience,the orientation of the government’s role in raising reshape mixed ownership reform of state-owned enterprises policy recommendations of the orientation of the government’s role.Rebuilding the role of the government is the key to the success of the new round of SOE mixed-ownership reform.This paper puts forward the following policy recommendations: First,strengthen the top-level design,and do a good job as the decision promoter of reform.Including the construction of a good system to ensure the system and give full play to the role of macro guidance;Second,deepen the streamlining of administration and delegating power,and do a good job of the owners of state-owned assets reform.Including adhere to the direction of the state-owned enterprise administrative reform and straighten out the relationship between the government and the market;Finally,we need to improve the governance system and do a good job of overseeing and upholding reform.These include improving the supervision of state-owned property rights and improving the governance structure of State-owned enterprises as legal persons.