Font Size: a A A

Provenance, Offset Equivalent and Palinspastic Reconstruction of the Miocene Cajon Valley Formation, Southern California

Posted on:2014-08-29Degree:M.SType:Thesis
University:University of California, Los AngelesCandidate:Stang, Dallon MichaelFull Text:PDF
GTID:2450390008450638Subject:Sedimentary Geology
Abstract/Summary:
Petrographic, conglomerate and detrital-zircon analyses of formations in southern California can determine consanguineous petrofacies and lithofacies that help constrain paleotectonic and paleogeographic reconstructions of the southwestern United States. Arkosic sandstone of the lower Middle Miocene Cajon Valley formation is exposed on the southwest edge of the Mojave block and juxtaposed against Mesozoic and Paleozoic rocks by the San Andreas fault (SAf). Early work in Cajon Valley referred to the formation as Punchbowl, due to its similar appearance to the Punchbowl Formation at Devil's Punchbowl (northwest along the SAf). However, paleontological work placed Cajon Valley strata in the Hemingfordian-Barstovian (18-14 Ma), as opposed to the Clarendonian-Hemphillian (13-9 Ma) Punchbowl Formation. Since the Cajon Valley formation was deposited prior to being truncated by the San Andreas fault, the 2400m-thick, laterally extensive subaerial deposits likely were deposited across what is now the fault trace. Restoring 310 km of dextral slip on the SAf system should indicate the location of offset equivalent sandstone. Restoration of slip on the SAf system places Cajon Valley adjacent to the Caliente and La Panza Ranges, east of San Luis Obispo. Although analysis of detrital zircon from Cenozoic sandstone throughout southern California has been crucial in establishing paleodrainage areas, detrital zircon from the Cajon Valley and equivalent formations had not been analyzed prior to this study.;Paleocurrents measured throughout the Cajon Valley formation indicate a source to the NE, in the Mojave Desert. Sandstone samples analyzed in thin section using the Gazzi-Dickinson method of point-counting are homogeneously arkosic, with slight compositional variability, making differentiation of the Cajon Valley formation and potential offset equivalents problematic. However, Branch Canyon Sandstone and Santa Margarita Formation samples are compositionally the best match for the Cajon Valley formation.;Detrital-zircon ages were determined from the Cajon Valley formation and related strata. These data are slightly more variable than sandstone composition, with distinct age peaks at 85-90 Ma, 150 Ma and 250 Ma. These ages correlate with batholiths in the SW Mojave Desert. Of the nine samples from six formations collected as potential offset equivalents, Branch Canyon and Santa Margarita samples are most similar to Cajon Valley samples, in terms of both detrital-zircon ages and sandstone composition.;Based on 310km of post-Miocene offset on the San Andreas fault system, the Cajon Valley formation restores adjacent to shallow-marine sandstone of the Santa Margarita Formation and Branch Canyon Sandstone Member of the Monterey Formation in the Caliente and La Panza ranges. Cajon Valley sandstone is interpreted to represent a Miocene fluvial system on a coastal plain, flowing toward a delta on a narrow continental shelf.
Keywords/Search Tags:Cajon valley, Formation, Miocene, Southern, Offset, San andreas fault, Sandstone, Equivalent
Related items