LPV H-infinity Control for the Longitudinal Dynamics of a Flexible Air-Breathing Hypersonic Vehicle

This dissertation establishes the method needed to synthesize and simulate an Hinfinity Linear Parameter-Varying (LPV) controller for a flexible air-breathing hypersonic vehicle model. A study was conducted to gain the understanding of the elastic effects on the open loop system. It was determined that three modes of vibration would be suitable for the hypersonic vehicle model. It was also discovered from the open loop study that there is strong coupling in the hypersonic vehicle states, especially between the angle of attack, pitch rate, pitch attitude, and the exible modes of the vehicle.;This dissertation outlines the procedure for synthesizing a full state feedback Hinfinity LPV controller for the hypersonic vehicle. The full state feedback study looked at both velocity and altitude tracking for the exible vehicle. A parametric study was conducted on each of these controllers to see the effects of changing the number of gridding points in the parameter space and changing the parameter variation rate limits in the system on the robust performance of the controller. As a result of the parametric study, a 7 x 7 grid ranging from Mach 7 to Mach 9 in velocity and from 70,000 feet to 90,000 feet in altitude, and a parameter variation rate limit of [.5 200]T was used for both the velocity tracking and altitude tracking cases. The resulting Hinfinity robust performances were gamma = 2.2224 for the velocity tracking case and = 1:7582 for the altitude tracking case. A linear analysis was then conducted on five different selected trim points from the Hinfinity LPV controller. This was conducted for the velocity tracking and altitude tracking cases. The results of linear analysis show that there is a slight difference in the response of the Hinfinity LPV controller and the fixed point H infinity controller. For the tracking task, the Hinfinity controller responds more quickly, and has a lower Hinfinity performance value. Next, the H infinity LPV controller was simulated using the nonlinear flexible hypersonic model for both the velocity tracking and altitude tracking cases. Both of these cases were subject to a ramp input and a multi-step input both with and without perturbation in the model. The results of the simulation show that the tracking state follows the command signal successfully though the perturbed system does show some higher frequency characteristics in the non-tracking states. It was discovered that there is an issue with integral windup when switching takes place in the controller, so an algorithm was implemented to reset the integration of the error on the tracking state when the switch takes place. It was also seen that there was a decline in altitude when tracking velocity, and a large change in velocity that occurred during altitude tracking. These results lead to the decision to include a unity gain regulation state on velocity for the altitude tracking and the altitude for the velocity tracking during the output feedback control synthesis.;The procedure for synthesizing an output feedback H infinity LPV controller for the hypersonic vehicle is also discussed in this dissertation. The output feedback design looked at velocity tracking and altitude tracking with rigid body motion variables for both the exible and rigid body hypersonic vehicle models. As with the full state feedback controller, a parametric study was conducted on each of these controllers to determine the number of gridding points in the parameter space and the parameter variation rate limits in the system. The parametric study reveals a 7x7 grid ranging from Mach 7 to Mach 9 in velocity and from 70,000 feet to 90,000 feet in altitude, and a parameter variation rate limit of [.1 200]T is preferable for both the velocity tracking and altitude tracking cases with both the exible and rigid body assumptions. The resulting Hinfinity robust performances were gamma = 113:2146 for the exible body velocity tracking case, gamma = 83.6931 for the rigid body velocity tracking case, gamma = 107:2043 for the exible body altitude tracking case, and gamma = 97:7403 for the rigid body altitude tracking case. A linear analysis was then conducted on five different selected trim points from the Hinfinity LPV controller. The results of this analysis show that there is a larger difference in the response of the Hinfinity LPV controller and the Hinfinity controller. For the tracking task, the Hinfinity controller responds more quickly, and has a lower Hinfinity performance value. Next, the Hinfinity LPV controller was applied to the exible nonlinear plant model. The rigid body controllers were applied to the exible plant model to see if the exible nature of the vehicle could be treated as a perturbation to the system. Additionally, there were simulations run both with and without sensor noise and parametric uncertainty. The results of simulation show that the rigid body controller is able to successfully apply to the exible body model for the velocity tracking case, but is unable to stabilize the altitude tracking case. It was also seen that the system is able to track the command signal while minimizing the variations seen in the altitude for the velocity tracking case and in the velocity during the altitude tracking case. Additionally, there was no obvious effect of perturbations in the system on the tracking state or secondary regulation state. There were high frequency responses associated with the other perturbed states.