Font Size: a A A

Biodeposition and biogeochemical processes in shallow, mesohaline sediments of Chesapeake Bay

Posted on:2009-07-07Degree:Ph.DType:Thesis
University:University of Maryland, College ParkCandidate:Holyoke, Rebecca RFull Text:PDF
GTID:2440390002493533Subject:Biogeochemistry
Abstract/Summary:
Stocks of the eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica , have been declining in Chesapeake Bay since the late 19 th century, and current strategies involve restoring culture of C. virginica on-bottom and in devices suspended within the water column. Subtidal suspension culture of C. virginica in Chesapeake Bay occurs mostly in sheltered inlets and tidal creeks and, thereby, has the potential to influence shallow water biogeochemical processes. To assess the influence of C. virginica biodeposits and benthic microalgae on sediment nitrogen and phosphorus exchange, field studies with C. virginica held in aquaculture floats and laboratory experiments were conducted. Enhanced organic nitrogen deposition from C. virginica biodeposits led to gradual increases in surface sediment nitrogen and pore water ammonium concentrations; however, modifications to pore water concentrations were not always expressed at the sediment-water interface. Benthic microalgae often modulated the influence of biodeposits on sediment nitrogen exchange but, as observed in laboratory experiments, the supply of nitrogen from C. virginica biodeposits may exceed their biological demand. Organic carbon from biodeposits had varying influences on aerobic respiration but consistently stimulated anaerobic metabolism. Shifts in net phosphorus exchange were driven by this anaerobic remineralization and concentrations of iron and manganese oxy(hydr)oxides, with transitions in fluxes coinciding with changes in benthic photosynthesis and oxidation of surface sediments. Manganese and iron oxy(hydr)oxides from biodeposits supported incorporation of added phosphorus and prevented exchange at the sediment-water interface in the absence of iron-sulfide mineral formation. Differences in the response of shallow water sediments to C. virginica biodeposits were due to the quality and quantity of biodeposits supplied, as well as the spatial and temporal variability within these sediments. Initial conditions and corresponding reference sediments illustrated the potential for sediment biogeochemistry and nutrient exchange from tidal creek sediments to vary spatially and temporally on relatively small scales. Factors influencing variability within tidal creek sediments were related to shifts in riverine freshwater inputs, macroalgal blooms, nutrient concentrations in overlying waters, and bioirrigation from the clam, Macoma balthica.
Keywords/Search Tags:Sediments, Chesapeake, Virginica, Water, Shallow, Concentrations
Related items