Research On The Ineffective Supervision Of Social Insurance Fund In A City

The social insurance fund is the most important material basis for the sustainable development of the social insurance system.To strictly prevent the loss of the social insurance fund and ensure the safety and integrity of the social insurance fund is directly related to the immediate interests of the vast number of insured personnel and social stability.Chinese government departments have issued a series of policies to supervise and constrain all aspects of social insurance funds.With the continuous development of social insurance,the management service mode has changed,bringing new challenges to the supervision of the fund.On the one hand,we should ensure the safe operation of the social insurance fund and the sustainable and healthy development of the social insurance enterprise;on the other hand,the supervision role is not really reflected,and the fund faces the risk of loss.This paper starts from the actual situation at the grass-roots level,introduces A case study,takes the social insurance fund supervision in A city as an example,and analyzes the ineffective supervision of social security fund from the perspective of institutional supervision of social security fund.This paper mainly adopts interview method to study,and interprets how to realize the benign effect of overall supervision through observing the attitude of various groups towards supervision implementation.The results show that the ineffective supervision of social security fund is caused by the reasons such as the failure of policy diversification,the difficulty in implementing policy implementation involving group factors,and the lack of whole-process management in the policy monitoring process.It is found that the development and improvement of social insurance fund supervision needs the joint efforts of all aspects.In order to achieve the goal of preventing and controlling risks of social insurance funds,we should improve and enhance the "internal factors of supervision departments","social factors of public participation" and "interactive factors of government information sharing".