An Analysis Of The Methods For The Research Of Innovative Management

All walks of life are inseparable from innovation.Academic research also needs innovation.So how can academic research be innovated and from what angles? This is the focus of this study.Practical academic research,especially for graduate students,often do not know where to start.Therefore,this study will put forward the guidance path for this dilemma,and analyze how to implement innovation in academic paper writing? How do management researchers raise research questions? In order to answer this question,this paper intends to start from a more fundamental research question: what strategies do management researchers use to distinguish between previous research and their own research? How do they sort out the past research?This paper mainly introduces the relevant researches on problem consciousness,how to raise research questions and how to make research contributions through the collation and analysis of relevant literature.It points out that original research and research contributions should meet the two conditions of the factual judgment that "current research is different from previous research" and the evaluative judgment that "research is meaningful".However,few scholars start from the evaluative judgment This paper analyzes how to implement the research problems that others haven’t done in the writing of academic papers.Based on the analysis of "others haven’t done" in the triangle model of scientific research put forward by some scholars,this paper discusses how to implement the research problems that others haven’t done in the writing of academic papers from two aspects of "differentiation strategy" and "conceptual framework".Based on the above ideas,this paper is divided into the following three parts.First of all,in order to analyze what kind of strategies management researchers use to distinguish the past research and their own research,this paper uses grounded theory and the analysis principle of qualitative text to summarize the types of differentiation strategies.Selected all empirical research papers published in the three journals of Nankai management review,management world and Journal of management engineering in 2018,collected 445 empirical research papers through CNKI platform,collected different descriptions of the paper title,author description and other studies,and summarized the main research issues to be studied,and after a series of pretreatment,and then data analysis.Through the open coding,spindle coding and saturation test of grounded theory,7 main categories are obtained,including method conflict,knowledge vacancy,contradiction,result evaluation,empirical verification,theoretical application and practical needs.Secondly,it describes the seven types of differentiation strategies one by one,including method conflict,knowledge vacancy,conflict,result evaluation,experience verification,theory application and reality,and randomly selects papers from 445 empirical research papers collected for analysis.Then,on the basis of the specific differentiation strategy,the paper puts forward a clear conceptual framework in the academic paper writing by using the differentiation strategy as a bridge through the demonstration route,and then explains it through an example.In addition,based on the analysis of the relationship between "differentiation strategy" and "conceptual framework",it is concluded that under the guidance of differentiation strategy,the author decides to build the conceptual framework of literature review,that is to say,what kind of differentiation strategy the researcher adopts largely determines the conceptual framework of literature review that the researcher can choose,which is the guidance for combing the existing literature.