The Combined Effects Of The Property Structure,market Structure On Innovation Behavior Of State-owned Enterprises

At present,the concept of "manufacturing powers" is widely recognized in China.Promoting the development of China's manufacturing industry through innovationdriven development strategies and supply-side structural reforms is already an important task for Chinese development of economy.Chinese manufacturing industry has been mainly in the low-end of the global industrial chain.Its development mainly depends on China's cheap labor costs and abundant natural resources.Facing the emergence of protectionism and a new round of scientific and technological revolution,we need to seize the strategic opportunity to realize the transformation and upgrading of the manufacturing industry and move towards the mid-to-high end of the global value chain,which will promote the healthy development of China's economy.In this process,innovation plays a vital role,furthermore,the innovation behavior of enterprises will be of great significance in the transformation and upgrading of the manufacturing industry and the stable development of economy.It is worth noting that the role of stateowned enterprises is irreplaceable during the economic transition period.Therefore,the innovation behavior of state-owned enterprises has a direct impact on China's economic development.Under the background of innovation and leading the transformation and upgrading,this paper builds the SSCP analysis method based on the theory of industrial organization.The property rights structure is introduced to analyze the influence of property rights structure and market structure on the innovation behavior of state-owned enterprises,and further explore the mechanism of the innovation behavior of stateowned enterprise on market performance.Then the empirical test of the impact of the analysis is carried out,and the results show that different market environments formed by property rights structure and market structure will have different effects on the innovation behavior of state-owned enterprises.In the market with a large proportion of state-owned property rights and strong monopoly,the innovation behavior of stateowned enterprises can be restricted,while the state-owned property rights account for a relatively small and competitive market would promote the innovation behavior of state-owned enterprises.Further,analysis shows that in the market with relatively small state-owned property rights and competitive market,the innovation behavior of stateowned enterprise enhances the market performance,otherwise suppresses market performance.On the basis of this conclusion,we sort out the development of Chinese competition policy to promote the market performance through the innovation behavior of state-owned enterprises,and put forward relevant suggestions on the reform of China's market structure and property rights structure.This means that the core of the improvement of market performance by the innovation behavior of state-owned enterprises lies in the property rights structure of low state-owned property rights and the market structure of competition.By combing the process of property rights structure change and policy orientation with the market structure optimization under the guidance of anti-monopoly policy after Chinese reform and opening up,we can realize that in the process of deepening the reform of state-owned enterprises,the state-owned property rights generally keep pace with non-state-owned property rights,showing different distributions of property rights in different industries.In the process of improving the anti-monopoly policy system,the market structure is generally competitive,but some areas still have a high degree of monopoly due to certain objective factors.In order to promote the improvement of performance level through the innovation behavior of state-owned enterprises,this paper puts forward relevant suggestions on the reform of the market structure and property rights structure based on the above conclusions and policy analysis results,including prudent promotion of property rights reform,reducing market monopoly,independent competitive business and oriented innovation.