On The Conflict And Balance Between Online Public Opinion Supervision And Judicial Adjudication

With the further popularization and development of the Internet,modern society has entered the era of "everyone has a microphone ".The relationship between Internet public opinion and judicial decision-making has been the focus of the law and media circles in recent years.Independent trial of judicial organs is the key to ensure judicial justice and maintain the authority of the law.However,the emerging major cases have become the object of public opinion,and then developed into influential cases.For more than a decade,the chinese law society case law research association,"southern weekend ",the law press "chinese law review" continuous "ten influential litigation" case selection,which can be seen in the community to our country’s judicial trends,especially influential judicial cases high attention.The increasing attention of network public opinion to judicial cases is an important manifestation of the progress of our society,the continuous improvement of legal system construction and the continuous popularization of legal system concept.How to grasp the characteristics of the influential judicial cases in the past five years and the information behind it,find out the public opinion to pay attention to the extra-judicial and intra-judicial reasons.In order to ensure that the judicial organs accept the supervision of public opinion,to explore the substantive factors behind the public opinion with professional rationality,and to reasonably determine the boundary of public opinion supervision is an important subject we need to study at present.In general,the supervision of network public opinion should be evaluated positively,and the network public opinion can play a positive role in the judicial trial to some extent,which makes the judicial organs take full account of the social influencing factors when dealing with such influential cases,and not blindly pursue procedural justice and ignore the substantive justice.It not only needs the efforts of the judicial organs themselves,but also needs to create a system guarantee to shield the external interference for the judiciary,and also to construct the recognition of the judicial authority in the whole society.get beneficial suggestions from practice,so as to realize the organic unity of legal effect and social effect.