My Country's Response To The Crisis In The South China Sea Arbitration Case

China has unquestionable sovereignty over the South China Sea.In recent years,the territorial voices have been raised around the neighboring countries of the South Island Reef with a threat to the security situation in the South China Sea.The countries outside the United States,led by the United States,continue to intervene in the South China Sea issue,further exacerbating the internationalization,complexity and long-termization of this issue.The dispute between China and the Philippines in the South China Sea dates back to the 1950 s.Although the two countries had dispute and friction in this area,it did not prevent the smooth development of bilateral relations.After the US returned to the Asia-Pacific in 2009,the US-Philippines alliance gradually strengthened,and the Philippines quickly drew closer to the United States to serve as the "bridgehead" for the United States to confront China in the South China Sea.After the Huangyan Island incident,the Philippines strengthened its determination to initiate international arbitration and submitted the South China Sea dispute to international arbitration in 2013 with the instigation and support of the United States.The situation in the South China Sea region is constantly tense,conflicts are frequent,and it is easy to cause an international crisis and affect peace and stability in the South China Sea.Therefore,it is very urgent to conduct crisis management research on the South China Sea issue.The South China Sea arbitration case has the typical characteristics of an international crisis,namely threatening and urgency.This incident not only violated China’s territorial sovereignty,but also seriously affected the diplomatic relations between China and the Philippines.The final ruling of the International Tribunal denied the nine-segment line delineated by China and jeopardized China’s core interests.During the promulgation of the 2016 arbitration results,frequent military cruises and exercises in the United States exacerbated the tension in the South China Sea and affected the proper resolution of the South China Sea issue.To this end,the Chinese government has made a position on the South China Sea arbitration case for non-participation and non-acceptance,and according to the development of the arbitration case,it has managed crisis management from different dimensions such as politics,economy,military,and public opinion.The second crisis has safeguarded China’s legitimate rights and interests in the South China Sea.To this end,it is necessary to analyze China’s crisis management strategies during this period and provide useful suggestions for the subsequent control of the South China Sea conflict.This article will combine theory with reality,sort out the relevant theories of international crisis management,analyze the characteristics of crisis,and the different stages of crisis management and the corresponding management methods,comprehensively use case analysis,literature research and other methods to conduct research and analysis on the South China Sea arbitration case.Explore the underlying causes and direct causes of the arbitration case in the Philippines,discuss the impact and crisis of the arbitration case on China,and study the reasons why China chose not to participate in the arbitration case,and as the arbitration case continues to advance,the crisis event It is divided into different stages of occurrence,development and climax,and specifically analyzes the countermeasures adopted by China.Finally,it analyzes the results of this crisis management and summarizes the characteristics and exposed deficiencies of China’s crisis management and control strategy.And make suggestions for improvement.