Research On The Acceptability Of The Court Decision

Acceptability of the court decision carries the social effect of law and judicial credibility,at the same time,it is about the achievement of China's socialist country under the rule of law and the maintenance of social stability and harmony.The acceptability of the court decision as an important part in our judicial practice field should be cherished,so firstly this paper focuses on the explanation and definition of the acceptability of the court decision.However,a decision is not necessarily endorsed by the parties to the case or other people.It can be widely accepted by the society only when it meets all the vital factors.If the judicial authority constantly questioned and criticized by people in the society,the whole legal authority will be difficult to establish.The foundation of nature,law and other kinds of order will also be a chaotic situation.So to solve one dispute case should never be the only target of the judicial practice.It is necessary to cultivate the belief of the parties to the case and the public in the operation of the judicial power through the proper adjudication process and fair adjudication results,so that we can raise the public's awareness of abiding by the law,and to give full play to the unified value scale of the judicial decision in the realization of social justice.The main ideas of this paper are as follows: a judgment is made by a judge according to law,the result of the judgment is presented as a judgment document,the content of the relevant decision is disseminated through the news media,and the final public evaluates the judicial decision.In this series of links,explore what factors may have a negative impact on the acceptability of the court decision and the possible ways to eliminate this potential impact.First of all,the construction of a high-quality team of judges is a necessary condition for the formation of high-quality judgments;secondly,the judgment documents can effectively improve the acceptability of the judgment by strengthening the interpretation of legal reasoning,clarifying the formation process and legitimate reasons of the conclusion of the judgment.Finally,for the parties to a case,we should improve the post-judgment answering system so as to solve the questions timely.For other members of the public,we should make great efforts to ensure the efficiency and authenticity of obtaining the trial process and results through the media.Strengthen the self-restraint of the media,and report the contents of the court decision fairly and objectively.