The Distinction And Determination Of The Crime Of Picking Quarrels And Causing Trouble And The Crime Of Intentional Injury

In orderto realize the function ofcriminallaw and ensure the thoroughnessandthoroughnessoffightingagainstcriminalcrimes,when criminallawisweavingthecrimegrid,itisinevitabletooverlapinsomekey areas,andtheambiguityandopennessofthecrimestructuremakethe sameactmaybeclassifiedintotwocrimestructures.Injudicialpractice,this kindofdifficultidentificationreactionistheconfusedapplicationofthe crimeofpickingquarrelsandcausingtroubleandthecrimeofintentional injury,aswellastheresultinginconsistentjudgmentstandardsanddifferent judgmentsinthesamecase.Inthenormsof China'scriminallaw,thecrimeofpickingquarrelsand causing trouble and the crime ofintentionalinjurybelong to different criminalcompositions.In terms ofjurisprudence,the legalinterests protectedbythecrimeofpickingquarrelsandcausingtroubleandthecrime ofintentionalinjuryarecrossedbutnotcompletelyconsistent.Typefromthe pointofthejudicialpractice,random beatingsstir-up-troublecrimeand intentionalinjuryoftenoccurintheprocessofapplyoverlap,especiallythe "random" beating "random" judge "intentionally hurtothers body" and "vicious" competition,causingrandom beatingsstir-up-troublecrimeand intentionalinjurytodistinguishthedifficulties.Duetodifferentpositionsand stagesofparticipation,judicialworkersand participantshave different understandingsofthesamecase,whichleadstodifferentunderstandingsof thedistinctionbetweenthecrimeofpickingquarrelsandcausingtroubleby beatingothersatwillandthecrimeofintentionalinjury.What'smore,the crimeofintentionalinjuryisalreadyacontroversialchargein China'sjudicial practice.Duetothepossibilityofpersonalinjurycausedbythevictim dueto justifiabledefense,gatheringpeopletofightandcausingtrouble,andthe similarityincriminalmeans,thecrimeofintentionalinjuryin China'sjudicial practiceisfourtimesasmanyasthecrimeofintentionalinjuryin Jpananda othercountries.Thisalsoindirectlyprovesthattherearecertaindeviationsintheidentification ofintentionalinjuryin China'sjudicialpractice,which includestheidentificationofthecasethatshouldbeidentifiedasintentional injuryasthecrimeofpickingquarrelsandcausingtroublebyrandomassault,andtheidentificationofthecrimeofpickingquarrelsandcausingtroubleby random assaultasthecrimeofintentionalinjury.Overtheyears,inorderto solve this problem,scholars have put forward some discriminating standardsfrom theaspectsoftheprotectionoflegalinterests,criminal motivation,injuryconsequences,etc.,whichcanprovideastrongguidance forpractice.Butin2008 the Mnistryof Pi ublic Scurityofthepublicsecuritye organunderthejurisdictionofthecriminalcasefilingofprosecution,the provisionsofthestandard(a)",2017" aboutthejurisdictionofthepublic securityorganoftheprovisionsofthecriminalcasefilingprosecution criterion supplementary provisions(a)and 2013 on the dealwith troublemakersexplainsomeissuesofapplicablelawcasefile,suchasfor stir-up-troublecrime,especiallyfortheconsequencesofrandom beatings stir-up-troublerequirements,andfurtherleadstotheobstacles.Anti-triadsinceputtingspecialstruggletocarryout,andsomeofthe blackevilforcecrimesarefullyexposed,thecriminalbehaviorcharacterized bytheuseofviolencebeatingothersmore,butwhatexactlyisrandom beatingstypestir-up-troublecrimeofintentionalinjury,thereisonesizefits alloridentifiedasstir-up-troublecrimeshallbegivenaheavier,optionaltype stir-up-troublecrimeofassaultandbatteryandthedistinctionbetweenthe intentionalinjurytoamoreurgentsituation.Therefore,thispaperfocuseson themainlineofthedistinctionbetweenthecrimeofpickingquarrelsand causingtroublebybeatingothersatwillandthecrimeofintentionalinjury.Basedontheresearchresultsalreadyobtainedbyscholars,theauthor furthermakesanin-depthandcomprehensiveanalysisofthedistinction betweenthecrimeofpickingquarrelsandcausingtroublebybeatingothers atwillandthecrimeofintentionalinjury.Theauthorbelievesthatthereisno problem withtheaboveissuesinfact,butthereisadeviationinthe applicationofthelaw.Thefundamentalreasonliesinthefactthatinthe process ofidentification ofcharges,the principle ofthe compatibility between criminalresponsibility and punishment and the theory of infringementoflegalinterestsarenotadheredto.Intheend,weshould makeacomprehensivejudgmentonthefactorssuchastheobjectofthe crime,thedestructionofsocialorder,themotiveofthehooligan,andthe meansofcommittingthecrime.Inthecomplexcrowdcrime,thecriminal suspectinthesamecasecanbeconvictedofboththecrimeofpickingupaquarrelandcausingtroubleandthecrimeofintentionalinjuryinstrict accordancewiththeconstitutiverequirementsofthelaw.Asforthecrimeof assemblingpeoplefoundinthecourseofeliminatingtheblackandevil,the charges should be determined differently due to the subjective and intentionaldifferencesamongthesuspects.Inshort,thepurposeofthis paperistofollowthetheoryofcriminalconstitutionandthebasicprinciples ofcriminaljustice,toestablishastandardforthedistinctionbetweenthe crimeofpickingquarrelsandcausingtroublebyrandom beatingandthe crimeofintentionalinjury,andtoprovideathinkingforthethoroughsolution ofthisdifficultprobleminjudicialpractice.