"Decisions on Legal Issues" of the National People’s Congress and its Standing Committee are things conceived in practice and often appear in official documents,which are inextricably linked with the law,but not the law itself.However,it is undeniable that it belongs to a part of the existing legal system of our country.Through type analysis and distinguishing from other decisions of the National People’s Congress and its Standing Committee,it is clear that "decisions on Legal Issues" are not made by law,but by the National People’s Congress and its Standing Committee,which have legislative attributes,certain restrictions on legal effect and application,and have a bottomless normative law Papers.It is not only closely connected with the development background of the times,but also constantly shows the development process of rule of law in content,forming a relatively independent procedure,which plays an important role in the reform and development.In order to realize its institutionalized development,"decisions on Legal Issues" should first be clear about their types and standardize "decisions on Legal Issues" on the basis of the rules of procedure of the National People’s Congressand the rules of procedure of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress Scope,which is of great significance to delimit the boundary with the law,especially with the matters of legal reservation and the relevant provisions of the organizational law in the future.At the same time,due to the limitation of their respective functions and powers of the NPC and the NPC Standing Committee,it is also necessary to distinguish the powers of the two to make decisions in order to meet the normative requirements and solve the problem of vague power boundary.Secondly,it is necessary to standardize the relevant legal issues Finally,by improving the corresponding deliberation procedure,introducing the necessity and feasibility study demonstration procedure,modifying the annulment procedure and publishing the procedure,it makes it more in line with the requirements of procedural justice. |