Analysis Of The Case Of Life Rights Disputes Of Lu Mou,Wang Mou,Zhang Mou And Zhou Mou

With the deepening of reforms in China,social and economic activities have become more frequent,and the types of joint infringement have been continuously enriched.The existing legal provisions on joint infringement in China are mainly found in the Tort Liability Law and the Human Rights Interpretation.The legislation makes preliminary provisions on the types and liabilities of joint infringement,but on the constituent elements and number of joint infringements.There is no operational provision for the infringer’s internal responsibility,the inability to contact the joint infringement,the difference between the common infringement of “multi-cause and one fruit”,the “direct combination” and the “indirect combination” of the infringement.Similarly,the discussion of the above issues in China’s academic circles is still a state of contending.In the case,the electric motorcycle caused the short-circuit caused by the short circuit of the electric motorcycle.In the process of handling the case,it was found that in addition to the electric vehicle owner,the owner of the house neglected the management of the house,and the village committee,fire department and other departments did not act.There is no specific regulation on the cause of the increase in the fire caused by the accumulation of goods in the public passages,which leads to disputes over the scope of the subject of the tort liability and the basis and specific proportion of the liability of the infringing entities.Firstly,the article begins with the controversial cases in practice,combining theory with practice.It is different from pure theoretical discussion and has certain innovation.Through the analysis of "common" theory,it uses objective theory to identify electric motorcycle owners,house owners and houses.The lessee,the village committee,the fire department and other departments are all eligible infringers.Secondly,through comparison and analysis with other types of infringements,the criteria for determining the infringement of multiple factors and one person are clarified,and the basis for the unclear provisions in laws and regulations is provided.Finally,through the comparative analysis of the size of the fault and the cause and force,the cause of the force is taken as the consideration factor for the multiple tort and responsibility of the infringement liability.It is different from the theoretical standard of the comprehensive investigation of the size and cause of the fault identified by themajority of the existing theories.Providing theoretical support for cases of multiple infringements in the judicial practice,which can provide reference for the court to handle similar cases,which can prevent and reduce the occurrence of disputes,and help to clarify the burden of multiple infringements.Improve the unclear provisions in the Tort Liability Law.