Research On The Relationship Between Public Opinion Supervision And Judicature Under The New Media Age

The advent of the new media and big data era has prompted news public opinion to present new features such as the diversity of the media,the large number of participants,and the trend of big data analysis.The wide range of its dissemination,the rapid spread of its speed,and the enormous social influence have directly led to the growing tension between the judicial and public opinion,posing a serious challenge to the judicial organs to exercise their powers independently.So how do you deal with the relationship between public opinion and justice in the context of new media? How to play the role of new media public opinion in the judicial supervision without exceeding its borders? What role should judicial workers be treating the challenges of new media public opinion? This article will study the new media’s new challenges to the judiciary with a focus on the characteristics of the new media’s public opinion supervision,and think about how to deal with the relationship between new media supervision and justice.This article will discuss the relationship between new media public opinion supervision and justice from the following four aspects.The first part will be through the analysis of the intervention process of the new media public opinion in the case of the case,the elevator persuasion case,and the basis of the research and discussion of this article.Through the observation of the characteristics of the new media public opinion supervision on two hot cases,the new media public opinion supervision will be discussed.The inevitability of research with judicial relations.The second part will analyze the relationship between public media supervision and justice through the case of the case of the case and the case of the elevator,and it has both positive and negative conflicts.The third part will further question the reasons for the conflict between the new media public opinion supervision and judicial decisions.The last part will put forward some specific countermeasures for the above reasons to form a benign interaction mechanism between new media public opinion supervision and justice.These countermeasures mainly include: standardizing the supervision behavior of new media public opinion,enhancing the independence of the judicial organs,formulating good laws to take into account the law and reason,improving the professional quality of judges,and establishing a public opinion response and guiding mechanism of the judicial organs.