China’s current administrative litigation reconciliation system has been established in the administrative trial,but it is a category of reform,development and change that belongs to the administrative trial method,and is not a litigation system under the legal system framework.Although the establishment of administrative litigation is based on the judicial sharing of the responsibility for the governance of the country and society and politics as the starting point,it effectively ends the substantive settlement of administrative litigation disputes.However,judging from the administrative judicial practice,the administrative litigation set up through the Supreme People’s Court’s active advocacy is not perfect.From the perspective of the judicial practice,this is contrary to the legislative purpose of the administrative litigation law,and it is also possible.It evolved into a "collusion" between judicial power and executive power.Given that China’s administrative litigation reconciliation is currently out of place,normalizing it to legalization may be a preferable method to solve this problem.This article is based on the analysis of China’s current administrative litigation reconciliation theory.Based on the jurisprudence foundation of administrative litigation settlement,the disposition of administrative power,and the choice of terms between “mediation” and “reconciliation”,it analyzes the current status of administrative litigation in China and examines Germany and Taiwan in China.After the administrative litigation reconciliation system,some suggestions on the legalization of the administrative litigation reconciliation system in our country were put forward based on the current situation of administrative judicial litigation in our country. |