The Question Procedure Research Of Athlete Biological Passport Judge Doping Violation

Athletes Biological Passport is a new tool,monitor the changes of athletes blood or urine,in combination with other relevant information,to determine whether used banned substances or way,relative to the direct detection of doping,it need follow-up evaluate experts and scientific evaluation related to the hearing,still has advantageous to the development of anti-doping movement.And after its application in detecting whether athletes belong to doping violations,several times to cause the reliability of the public as a doping test tool to its integrity and unity of the applicable standard,this paper want to clarify the procedure between Athletes Biological Passport assessment and result management of corresponding judges,research use Athletes Biological Passport judge doping violate whether scientific and reliable.Biological passport evaluation of athletes,belong to detect the abnormal when athletes blood or urine samples follow-up management phase,mainly includes the experts evaluate and result management of judges.The specialist responsible for the use of statistics,sports physiology and so on,to evaluate biological passport,and reference to explain specific situations such as athletes,to determine whether the use of doping,then to a hearing committee evaluate,but this stage because the lack of hearing capabilities and the expert opinion of excessive trust,very easy to appear only to the phenomenon of evaluate,Court of Arbitration for Sport also has the problems to a certain extent.In other words,the referee organization should refer to all the related information in judging the rationality of the expert opinion,and whether athletes use banned substances or way.Otherwise,the current assessment system of biological passports is deficient in expert evaluation and results management.Specifically,expert evaluation phase is responsibility of cross-border,expert evaluation is not transparent,lack standardized appraisal report,result management contains the hearing committee excessive dependence on the opinions of experts and evaluate of sports arbitration court on the opinions of experts,probabilistic tools "satisfiction standard"is not clear,lack examines to the subjective state of athletes.To this,in order to better play the role of the biological passport,we should combine the actual situation of ABP application,make improvement from following aspects:normative expert evaluation pattern,improve the transparency of expert evaluation,strengthen the independence of the hearing committee,balance the athletes point of view and expert opinions,strengthen the organization of expert evaluation,evidence examination player’s subjective state,safeguard its impartiality,drive the anti-doping movement.