The Four Problems About Jiang Jie

Jiang Jie was a Survivor Ci-Poets of the Southern Song Dynasty,whose life is unknown.Taking Jiang Jie as the research object.the author chooses four related issues to form the framework of the paper: the year of birth and death;the time of creation of five ci-poems;the phonological features of Zhu shan Ci and textual research on lost works.The first chapter is about the year of birth and death.The author draws inspiration from Jiang's family genealogy,which takes Jiang Jie as his ancestor,and makes a reasonable judgment for his life by referring to the official system of the Yuan Dynasty and combining his ci works Yu Mei Ren(Listening to the rain).With regard to Jiang Jie's death year,the author re-examines the creation time of Yuan Gong zheng Ji Judged by the Former Government,and combines with the speculation of Zhou Zuru's descendants on his death year,thus determining the possible interval of Jiang Jie's death year.On the basis of the first section,the second chapter will synthesize the historical,economic and military data of the Yuan Dynasty and verify the creation time of Jiang Jie's five poems.The are:Gao Yang Tai(The fifteenth day of the first month of leap);Qin Yuan Spring(To Yuejun to celebrate his birthday);He Xin Lang(Living in Jianzhe Province after the War);He Xin Lang(Wu jiang);Shao Nian You(The maple forest is red and the smoke rises)The third chapter focuses on the phonological characteristics of Zhu shan Ci.Jiang Jie is proficient in phonology.His ci-poems pay attention to the choice of words,the length of sentences and the density of rhymes,which are closely related to the feelings expressed.From these three aspects,the author makes a deep analysis of the phonological features of Zhu shan Ci.The chapter four is a textual research on Jiang Jie's lost works.The author found seven lost poems of Jiang Jie in several editions of Jiang's genealogy.By using the knowledge of various disciplines,the author analyzed and textually examined five lost ci-poems,and maintained a questionable attitude towards the other two lost poems.