Reconstruction Of Argumentative Discourse From The Point Of Pragma-dialectics

In recent years,the research and teaching of logic has gained great progress in China.However,the study of informal logic has not received enough attention in philosophical and logical circles.Although in their lives people use reasoning and argumentation a great deal,the research of argumentation is still far from real life.As the most representative argumentation theory in contemporary argumentation research,the theory of “pragma-dialectics” originates from the Amsterdam school represented by Dutch scholar Eemeren,F.H.van.By abandoning the simple formal research method,the pragma-dialectics theory introduces argumentation into specific practice from the perspective of pragmatics,providing a feasible approach for setting up argumentation under the context daily discourse.This paper aims to study the field of analysis of pragmatic argumentation theory,of which the main task lies in finding out the way of using the ideal model of “critical discussion” to construct argumentative discourse to resolve the differences of opinion.By providing a basic tool for reconstructing realistic discourse with pragmatic argumentation theory,utilize the pragma-dialectics theory to demonstrate real discourse cases,and conduct pragmatic analysis and evaluation accordingly.This paper will use comparative analysis,interdisciplinary research and historical analysis.The exploration of pragmatic dialectics will be established on the “standard” theory of pragmatic dialectics,while the reconstructing of argumentative discourse to achieve the combination of theory and reality stands as the in-depth research of “standard” theory of this paper.