Comparative Analysis Of The Exclamatory "Zhen" "Duo" "Hao"

“真”“多”“好”are commonly used as adverbs of degree meaning in modern Chinese.They are also the exclamatory marks of high usage frequency and clearer sense of exclamation in modern Chinese.Based on the national language of modern Chinese corpus,through the three perspective analysis method,comparative method and quantitative analysis method,the passage is combined with previous research results of scholars.The passage is focus on comparative analysis of exclamation of “真”“多”“好”in syntactic,semantic and pragmatic aspects of the similarities and differences,hoping to have some help to the teaching Chinese as a foreign language.This article is divided into seven parts,of which the second,third and fourth chapters are the main part of this article.1.Introduction section.This chapter summarizes the origin of the topic,the significance of the topic,the research overview,the research methods,the source of corpus and the innovation.2.Syntactic analysis of“真/多/好+AP/VP”.This chapter analyzes the similarities and differences between“真+AP/VP”“多+AP/VP”“好+AP/VP”from the two aspects of sentence function and combination function respectively.3.“真/多/好+AP/VP”,which limits the semantic restriction of exclamation.This chapter compares the similarities and differences of the three from the three aspects of the restriction of the reality of the situation and the limitation of the emotions of the situation.4.The pragmatic analysis of“真/多/好+AP/VP”are analyzed from two aspects:the relationship between the sigh and the speaker and listener;the similarities and differences between the pragmatic functions.Among them,the discussion of pragmatic functions is more detailed.They compare the similarities and differences between“真/多/好+AP/VP”in evaluation function,self-expression function,reminder function,confirmation function and inference function.It is also one of the innovations in this article.5.Based on the comparative analysis of the substitution rules,this chapter summarizes the rules of“真+AP/VP”“多+AP/VP”“好+AP/VP”which cannot be substituted based on the syntactic,semantic and pragmatic analysis of second,third and fourth chapters.6.The concluding part summarizes the full text and points out some inadequacies in this paper.