Font Size: a A A

The Value Of Ultrasonography In The Diagnosis Of Epiphyseal Injury In Children

Posted on:2019-12-31Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:Y L HuangFull Text:PDF
GTID:2394330566482004Subject:Clinical medicine
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Objective:To explore the value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of epiphyseal injury in children.Methods:48 cases of joint trauma were examined by ultrasonography and 45 of them were classified and measured.In 23 cases of the operative group,18 cases were examined by X-ray,CT and ultrasound.Moreover the results of X-ray,CT and ultrasound were compared with surgical results.The ultrasonic measurement was compared with the CT measurement in 22 cases.Ultrasound typing and surgical typing were all classified according to Salter-Harris classification.Result:The positive incidence of examinations by ultrasound and X-ray were respectively 93.7% and 89.5% among the 48 cases,and the difference between them was statistically significant(P<0.05).In 45 cases of ultrasonic quantitative evaluation,the average ESD of the operative group(n=22)and the non-operative group(n=23)were(7.68±3.35)mm and(2.29±1.38)mm respectively,and there was a significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05).The average measured value of examinations by ultrasound and CT were(6.41±3.86)mm and(5.88±3.71)mm respectively in the 22 cases,and there was no significant statistical difference between them(P>0.05).But there was a significant correlation between the two groups,ultrasound and CT(P<0.05).The ultrasonic typing and the surgical typing matched well among the 23 cases,and there was no significant statistical difference between them(P>0.05).In 23 cases of the operative group,18 cases were examined by CT.There was no significant statistical difference in the positive coincidence rate among examinations by X-ray,CT and ultrasound in 18 cases of the operative group(P>0.05).There was no significant statistical difference of ESD among the different sides and different gender in 45 cases(P > 0.05).Conclusion: The detection rate of ultrasound for epiphyseal injury with smaller age and children with slightly shifted epiphyseal injury is higher than that of X-ray.At the same time,ultrasound can be used as a quantitative method to evaluate the separation of epiphyseal injury,and the classification diagnosis of epiphyseal injury by ultrasound is exact.Therefor ultrasound has certain value in assisting clinical diagnosis and guiding treatment.
Keywords/Search Tags:epiphyseal injurie, ultrasonography, imaging examination, children
PDF Full Text Request
Related items