Clinical Efficacy Of Bifidobacteria And Montmorillonite Powder Combined Low-lactose Diet In The Treatment Of Rotavirus Enteritis

Objective:observe and compare the clinical efficacy and medicine security of three different treatments(1.Bifidobacteria;2.Bifidobacteria and Montmorillonite powder;3.Bifidobacteria,Montmorillonite powder and combined low-lactose diet),and investigate the effective measure of rotavirus enteritis.This paper is expected to provide some basis for the treatment of clinical rotavirus enteritis.Methods:Based on the prepared inclusion and exclusion criteria,this paper collects 150 cases in the treatment of rotavirus enteritis in Dalian Chidren's Hospital from January 2015 to January 2018.The whole samples are randomly divided into three group: 1.Control group(Bifidobacteria)2.Treatment group 1(Bifidobacteria and Montmorillonite powder)3.Treatment group 2(Bifidobacteria,Montmorillonite powder and combined diet with low-lactose diet).This paper will observe the efficacy,course of disease,concomitant symptoms and getting better time to comprehensively analyze the effect and untoward reaction of the treatment.Results:1.Total efficient(TE): The Total efficient of treatment group 1(84%)and treatment group 2(90%)are higher than the Total efficient of the control group(66%),and the difference is significant(P<0.05).The Total efficient of the treatment group 2 is higher than the treatment group 1,but the difference is insignificant(P>0.05).2.Hospital stays and getting better time of the defecate character: The average hospital stays of control group(5.04±1.03 days)is longer than the average hospital stays of treatment group 1(4.68±0.71 days),and both average hospital stays of control group and treatment group 1 are longer than the average hospital stays of treatment group 2(4.34±0.92 days).The getting better time of the defecate character of control group(3.08±0.97 days)is longer than the treatment group 1(2.66±1.10 days),and both getting better time of the defecate character of control group and treatment group 1 are longer than the treatment group 2(2.26±0.88 days).The difference is significant(P<0.05).3.Durations of fever and getting better time of the emesis: Durations of fever(2.44±0.88 days)and getting better time of the emesis(2.03±0.76 days)of treatment group 2 are shorter than the durations of fever(2.83±0.83 days)and getting better time of the emesis(2.38±0.68 days)of treatment group 1,both durations of fever(3.12±0.78 days)and getting better time of the emesis(2.72±0.74 days)of treatment group 1 and treatment group 2 are shorter than control group.The difference is significant(P<0.05).4.Defecating frequency: Before the third day of the admission,the defecating frequency of all control group,treatment group 1 and treatment group 2 are smaller than the defecating frequency before the treatment group,and the defecating frequency is declining,the tendency of decline in treatment group 2 is the most significant.After the third day of admission,the defecating frequency of treatment group 1(1.86±1.26 times)is smaller than control group(2.04±1.69 times),the defecating frequency of treatment group 2(1.76±1.78 times)is smaller than treatment group 1,but the difference is insignificant(P>0.05).On the third day of the admission,the defecating frequency of treatment group 2 is smaller than control group,and the difference is insignificant(P>0.05).5.Total efficiency at different ages: the total efficiency of control group,treatment group 1 and treatment group 2 for children older than 2 years of age(86.70%,90.00%,94.40%)are higher than the total efficiency of control group,treatment group 1 and treatment group 2 for children younger than 2 years of age(60.00%,80.00%,81.30%),but the difference is insignificant(P>0.05).The total efficiency of all the cases for children older than 2 years of age(90.70%)are higher than the total efficiency of all the cases for children younger than 2 years of age(73.80%),and the difference is significant(P<0.05).6.No untoward reaction in all cases,like rash and intractable constipation.Conclusion:1.In the treatment of rotavirus enteritis,the curative effect of bifidobacteria combined with montmorillonite powder and the curative effect of bifidobacteria and montmorillonite powder combined diet with low-lactose diet is better,shorten the heat,vomiting time and improve the defecate character.the curative effect of bifidobacteria and montmorillonite powder combined diet with low-lactose diet is great.2.All three treatments can decline the defecating frequency before the third day of admission.3.Using the bifidobacteria,montmorillonite powder and diet with low lactose in the treatment of rotavirus enteritis is with less side effects and high security.