The Research About Land Usufruct Returning Policy Performance Evaluation Based On The Collective And Farmers

With gradually accelerating urbanization and higher demand for land,the nation requires to levy land to satisfy the need of economic development.Nevertheless,the traditional compensation of levying land has hardly not met the long-term interest of land-levied farmers.Under the circumstance,land usufruct returning is widely supported as a creative strategy.land usufruct returning can change the operation mode of rural industry,develop rural collective economy,and guarantee land-levied farmers to enjoy land value-added revenue,thus promoting development of urbanization,industrialization and modernization of rural economy.Firstly,the thesis summarizes,from the research of land property by foreign scholars,and the basic nature of land usufruct returning,and the motive,policy performance,and countermeasure and suggestion of system establishment from the system by domestic scholars.It raises the significance of appraisal on policy performance of land usufruct returning,based on the collective organization and individual farmers.Secondly,through the analysis of relevant concepts and theories,it clarifies the aim of land usufruct returning:rapid economic growth,sustainable utilization of resource,improvement of social welfare,and high efficiency of governmental function.Based on the aim,the theoretical analysis frame of performance appraisal on land usufruct returning is built.Thirdly,it analyzes the background of land usufruct returning in Hangzhou city,and summarizes the documents of laws and regulations that involving in development progress,key point and situation of implementation since the application of land usufruct returning in jianggan district based on,and Further summarize the management of land usufruct returning and Assets quantification process in jianggan district which is the study district,finally,to conduct description of the benefit from the application of land usufruct returning,taking Sancha community in Hangzhou as example.Fourthly,in the collective level,it takes the aim of land usufruct returning as evaluation index system.Evaluation is conducted by applying fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and analytic hierarchy process on the performance of land usufruct returning in collective level.Fifthly,in the individual level,it adopts difference-in-differences model in econometrics,puts growth rate of per capital net income of households as explained variable,and analyzes the influence extent of farmers'increasing income benefit after the implementation of land usufruct returning.Sixthly,it conducts analysis of performance result in both collective and individual farmer level,figures the problems within,and pointedly provides policy suggestion,to offer reference to further progress of land usufruct returning.The research shows:firstly,the economic,ecological,and governmental function benefits,from land usufruct returning in collective level,basically reach the policy aim,so the policy of land usufruct returning in jianggan district is referential.According to the result,it shows that every benefit level still enjoys the space of improvement,that economic and social benefits are closer to the aim,and that ecological benefit and government function still need further extension and ensure the further improvement of comprehensive benefit.Thereinto,in the social benefit,the construction of recreational and cultural facilities might defect;in the ecological benefit,farmers have lower satisfaction on natural landscape and noise pollution;in the governmental function,farmers hold higher expectation to the publicity of governmental work procedure.Secondly,the policy of land usufruct returning in the individual farmer level,obviously promotes the farmers,income within five year's application and displays positive influence,but from the sixth year,the increasing effect gradually reduces.It elaborates that the policy of land usufruct returning promotes the farmers' income in a short run,but from the long run,it seems not obvious,namely without consistent increasing effect.The reason for the emerge of above argument might be:the specialty of specific rules in stock administration contributes to the long-run effect shortage;price fluctuation influences on income;collective economic income largely leans into the outcome of social welfare;the exploration of reserved land progresses slowly and development projects stagnates,to name a few.The policy suggestions below are relevantly put forward:firstly,to ensure the farmer's right of reserved land benefit to be informed;secondly,to construct good community environment for levied farmers;thirdly,to strengthen the building of land-reserved development team;fourthly,to partially finance social insurance and facility construction from government,fifthly,to raise the application of land usufruct returning into legal level.