Hu’s Intentional Homicide Case Study

With the increase in the crime rate of juveniles,the issue of how to solve juvenile crime has gradually become more and more important in the society,and the discussion triggered by it has become increasingly fierce.Taking the Mr.Hu’s intentional homicide case as an entry point,Analyze the sharpest part of the contradiction of juvenile delinquency in social work to obtain a feasible conclusion,whether the minimum age of criminal responsibility should be reduced,if choose to reduce,the magnitude of reduction,if the choice remains unchanged,whether it should be fully maintained.Frist,the detailed discussion of the specific facts of this case has fully explained the seriousness of the juvenile delinquency issue and the cause of the social concerns that have been raised,this starts the discussion of the full text.Second,introduce a variety of doctrines to analyze the academic ideals of convicting and the legal provisions,judicial experience,and legal effects of juvenile delinquency in other countries,and as a theoretical basis and basis for adjusting and adjusting the age of criminal responsibility.Third,based on the study of the actual problems and actual conditions of juvenile delinquency in our country,and considering previous analysis,we believe that the lower limit of criminal responsibility should not be sloppy but should be supplemented and adjusted in other ways,only in this method can we get the conclusion that the social effect is maximized.Last,under the premise of maintaining the age of criminal responsibility,put forward of use the criminal policy of loose and strictness to control,coordinate multiple social forces for supervision,perfection of light crime for punishment and non-crime correction,use these methods to adjust and solve a series of problems of juvenile delinquency in our country.The conclusion that the lower age limit for criminal responsibility should not be lowered has already taken full account of the implementation of the law and the practical operation of various regulatory measures,therefore,the research results that should not reduce the age of criminal responsibility for juvenile delinquency and regulated by other supplementary measures,can also have a certain practical significance for the specific trial of juvenile delinquency in our country.