The newly revised Trademark Law first with the right to regulate, gives guidance to balance the interests of trademark and unregistered trademark to certain extent. However, the provisions of this clause still give rise to a lot of vague, ill-defined problems, such as "having a certain influence of trademarks" and "the original scope to continue to use",additional appropriate distinction ID" etc,which need to be made clear and specific explanation. This paper attempts to interpret detailed specification contents, explain their first use of the trademark rights of the constituent elements and give applicable comments and views on the combination of theory and judicial practice, the aforementioned problems to deepen understanding. Firstly, prior use of trademark brief overview, then by analyzing the first use of the trademark rights of existing norms, noting the relevant provisions in the regulations on some abstract, thus laying the groundwork for the discussion below. Then Elements trademark first with the right to explore, some of the specific concepts and analysis of the problem, including the use of prior knowledge, to have a certain impact on understanding. Finally, the right to use the trademark to interpret applicable regulatory issues. The main difference between the study include logos, trademarks first with issues such as the right to limit the transfer of the original scope of how to understand, additional appropriate. |