| The China,great ch anges have taken place in age and knowledge stru cture of the staff,the staff’s outlook on life,the values are quite different with previous times,if you can not handle the contradiction between employee psychological contract and incentive mechanism of fairness,the staf f of thei r own developm ent and the developm ent of enterprises will draw f urther apart the ente rprise management system,m ay from the internal collapse,causes the enterprise brain drain,which greatly restricts the further development of the enterprise.Justice of the incentive mechanism of enterprise hum an resource management is very important,it affects the enterprise talent and how to use the talent to create benefits for the enterprise,la ck of fairness will make employee satisfaction decline,thus affecting the working efficiency,and even lead to serious brain drain.The enterprise incentive mechanism should be the change of the whole organization culture,including the guidance,feedback,salary and promotion decision and the leg al exposition.This statem ent already includes most of the content of the current performance management system.As its bearer of the performance management is the staf f and m anagers together,the m anagers to give guidance and support,to achieve the overall goal of a process.Can be regarded as a form of contract.But previous studies tend to enterp rises and employees two yuan opposition,the research method presupposes that enterprises and employees is the opposite relationship between subject and object based on the emphasis on the enterprises to adopt the restrictive role different incentive mechanism for employees.This kind of research has achieved fruitful results,but with the cha nge of knowledge structure and value of contemporary staff view(mainly the awakening of individual consciousness),this kind of research has gradually exposed the shor tcomings,the research on this problem is necessary to carry out in-depth reflection from the basic theory.In the view of psychological contract,the b iggest difference with the traditional research way of this problem is that the psychological contract theory,the relationship between enterprises and employees as the interaction between the subject and the main relationship,more directly and accurately analyze the interaction between enterp rise incentive mechanism and fairn ess of em ployees,reflects the rela tive to the psychological contract theory of subject between the thought of study on the superiority of the method based on the traditional relationship between subject and object.In the view of psychological contract,equity incentive mechanism of enterprises is no longer a sim ple enterprise pay interests fo r the employees to work hard this sim ple framework of rights and respons ibilities and pay and return equivalence,but as the enterprise organization(similar to the ancien t Greek city-s tate of the interes ts of the community)staff and enterprises(similar to the ancient Greek concep t of the citizen)between justice."Justice is the ratio,injustice is a violation of the proportion,there are more or less,which is frequently encountered in a variety of activities." The justice of the incentive mechanism of the enterprise is ref lected in the distribution of the proportion of justice Aristotle mentioned,is a share of the equal proportion of mutual factors.Distribution of the spe cific implementation of justice can be divid ed into two categories: "there are two kinds of equal num ber,equality and value equality.Depending on the number of equality refers to the number or size of people with the same or equivalent value: on the basis of equality refers to equal in proportion.There is a proper example in the enterpri se: each working day is eight hours,the absolute number is equal,and everyone enj oyed the holiday according to the enterprise standard shuttle is completely consistent,is reflected in the number of equal distribution of wages;but due to only reflect th e value of the ratio is b ased on equality.Because of the different positions of different individuals because of extremely poor,sometimes the difference in unit tim e contribution to the enterpri se,if you take the distribution of numerical equality will undoubtedly have great defects,and has been continuous ly the damage for the enterprise,is a typical cas e of China’s planned economy era of the big absolute equalitarianism.Aristotle on the pr inciple of equality of distribution,not only the number of equality,nor is the r atio equal.That is the true m eaning of justice in distributive behavior: the m eaning of justice is neithe r inclined to equality,nor does it tend to be unequal.The incentive mechanism of enterprise fairness with each other obviously in the psychological contract in the distribution of each latitude,it deserve neither be inclined to absolute equalitarianism should not only the result of one-sided tendency to extreme proportional equality.It should tak e the tw o extremes of the m iddle,namely the interaction between "deserved". |