The Analysis On Drug Trafficking Case

In a Yan Mou,Zeng Mou,Wan Mou of drug trafficking case trial,defenders,prosecutors and judicial organ in master-slave make identifying,crime form,contributions of cognizance,temptation investigation involved the fact that how to identifying subjective intentional produced larger controversy.The presiding judge after full of death penalty sentencing reasoning,make the opinion of Yan Mou?Zeng Mou and Wan Mou sentenced to death.There are two kinds of opinions in the discussioning of this case.A kind of agree with the opinion of the presiding judge to the three defendants sentenced to death,but it is also a kind of most opinion on the defendant Yan Mou a death penalty,to the defendant Zeng mou and Wan mou,a two-year suspension of execution to death.Finally,the case for the defendant Yan a drug trafficking sin sentenced to immediate execution,the defendant Zeng Mou and Wan Mou drug trafficking offenses and sentenced to death a two-year suspension of execution.Case after review by the Supreme Court of second instance and the death penalty,got the support.This case,the presiding judge of the death penalty sentencing argument not recognised by most people,the reason is that the deviation in the sentencing reasoning process.Through the analysis of this case focal point,and reconstruct the death penalty sentencing process,to final reasonable judgment results.