Although China’s corporate registration review system is constantly improving,but still far from meeting the needs of the rapid development of the market economy.The complexity of the registration matters,the unclear nature of the review principle and the weakness of the administrative responsibility research,making the practice of increasing the number of corporate registration disputes.This article takes the case as a clue,based on the court judgment,puts forward the controversy of the case.This paper analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the three different theories and analyzes the principles of legislation,legal theory and historical process,and points out the view that China is currently suitable for the principle of careful review.Secondly,according to the question of the notice in the case,the author analyzes the unreasonable judgment of the court of judgment,and puts forward the personal view which is different from the judgment of the court.And the author puts forward the attention duty in the civil law as the starting point,To build the industrial and commercial organs of the duty system to clarify the industrial and commercial authorities in the company registration review of the attention duty.Finally,according to the question of whether the registration of industrial and commercial change should be withdrawn,the author analyzes the case with the law and puts forward the different views on the three court decisions.According to the existing view,the author analyzes the principle of imputation for the main body of industrial and commercial enterprises and the industrial and commercial reviewers,To further establish the industrial and administrative organs of the administrative responsibility system to improve the company registration review system to reduce the company registered litigation. |