The Qualitative Research On Cheating Compensation For Demolition E.G

Practice in a demolition and judicial staff in duty crime cases identified more or less there is a problem,we can see that the perpetrator was fraud,bribery,embezzlement and other decisions.These offences similar in some respects,is not easy to distinguish.Full advantage of these features and limits of the charges,for the settlement of disputes is of great significance.This paper is divided into four parts:The first part,the basic circumstances of the case.This part consists of case,The demolition is still in the hands of the national financial sector,Zhu as the director of the village committee did not assist the government to manage the demolition compensation,Does not meet the requirements for national staff,Zhu ’s behavior should be characterized as fraud.The second part,the legal analysis of the relevant issues in this case.The interpretation of the focus of this case depends on the understanding of the following questions: First,the identity of the national staff analysis.Village cadre which case is the national staff.Second,the use of duties to facilitate the analysis of the connotation of duty.Third,the crime of embezzlement,bribery and the crime of fraud.Respectively,described the crime of corruption and bribery,bribery and fraud the key difference.Fourth,there is a qualitative analysis of the joint crime between the identity and the unidentified person.The second part,the legal analysis of the relevant issues in this case.The interpretation of the focus of this case depends on the understanding of the following issues,first,the purpose of illegal possession of the judicial analysis.Second,the identity of the national staff identification analysis.Village cadre which case is the national staff.Third,the use of duties to facilitate the definition of duty.Fourth,there is a qualitative analysis of the joint crime between the identity and the unidentified person.The third part,the analysis and conclusions of this case.State staff Zhu does not meet the "use of the convenience of the job" does not constitute a crime of corruption,Zhu Mouming know an attempt to cheat demolition compensation is still to provide help for its behavior,Zhu received a $ 40 million after the benefits can not Was repeated evaluation,is a common fraud to the stolen money,Zhu should set up fraud.The fourth part,the study of the case.First,the analysis of the nature of the demolition compensation,from the crime object to distinguish crime.Second,in the search for the case,found a lot of people on the "Criminal Law" Article 93 of the second paragraph of the interpretation of "different understanding,the author put forward their own views.Third,the issuance of criminal guidance cases to regulate...